Emergency radiology demand in a touristic region: residence status as a driver of imaging use

To assess whether residence status influences the use of radiological services in emergency departments (EDs) in a high-tourism region of Northern Italy. This retrospective study analyzes all ED visits in the Autonomous Province of Trento from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2024. Patients were categorized as residents or non-residents based on municipality of residence. Demographic, clinical, and contextual variables were extracted from the ED database. Regression models (OLS, Poisson, negative binomial, and logistic) were applied to evaluate determinants of radiological examination volume and workload, and the impact of residence status, including interaction with triage priority codes. The sample includes 738,864 patients who underwent at least one radiological examination (overall volume of 1,474,937 imaging examinations). Non-residents accounted for 18.2% of patients and 20% of all radiological examinations. On average, they underwent significantly more imaging per visit than residents (2.19 vs. 1.95), even after controlling for confounding variables. Differences were most pronounced in high-priority cases: non-residents with red triage codes received nearly four additional examinations. Skeletal imaging was particularly over-represented among non-residents, consistent with trauma-related visits during tourism. Logistic regression showed non-residents had 31.9% higher odds of undergoing disproportionately high imaging volumes. Residence status significantly influences diagnostic imaging use in emergency settings. Non-residents, particularly in severe clinical conditions, undergo more extensive radiological evaluation. This likely reflects diagnostic uncertainty and lack of prior medical history. Findings underscore the need for adaptive resource planning in touristic areas and call for further studies on clinical appropriateness and outcome impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Radiology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-026-02464-4
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency radiology demand in a touristic region: residence status as a driver of imaging use

Marco Parillo, Milena Calabrese, Federica Vaccarino, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi et al.
Emergency Radiology
Radiology practices and education
article

Emergency radiology demand in a touristic region: residence status as a driver of imaging use

Marco Parillo, Milena Calabrese, Federica Vaccarino, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi, Gianluca Capone
article en

Abstract

To assess whether residence status influences the use of radiological services in emergency departments (EDs) in a high-tourism region of Northern Italy. This retrospective study analyzes all ED visits in the Autonomous Province of Trento from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2024. Patients were categorized as residents or non-residents based on municipality of residence. Demographic, clinical, and contextual variables were extracted from the ED database. Regression models (OLS, Poisson, negative binomial, and logistic) were applied to evaluate determinants of radiological examination volume and workload, and the impact of residence status, including interaction with triage priority codes. The sample includes 738,864 patients who underwent at least one radiological examination (overall volume of 1,474,937 imaging examinations). Non-residents accounted for 18.2% of patients and 20% of all radiological examinations. On average, they underwent significantly more imaging per visit than residents (2.19 vs. 1.95), even after controlling for confounding variables. Differences were most pronounced in high-priority cases: non-residents with red triage codes received nearly four additional examinations. Skeletal imaging was particularly over-represented among non-residents, consistent with trauma-related visits during tourism. Logistic regression showed non-residents had 31.9% higher odds of undergoing disproportionately high imaging volumes. Residence status significantly influences diagnostic imaging use in emergency settings. Non-residents, particularly in severe clinical conditions, undergo more extensive radiological evaluation. This likely reflects diagnostic uncertainty and lack of prior medical history. Findings underscore the need for adaptive resource planning in touristic areas and call for further studies on clinical appropriateness and outcome impact.

Emergency Radiology
University of Verona (IT), University of Parma (IT), University of Trento (IT), Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (IT)
Università degli Studi di Trento
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.