Variability of Sural <scp>SNAP</scp> and Peroneal <scp>CMAP</scp> Amplitudes Limits Consistent Electrodiagnosis of Chronic Axonal Polyneuropathy: A Cross‐Sectional Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Current consensus guidelines for the electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy derive from highly standardized investigations performed in specialist centers, raising the question of whether they are equally applicable in everyday general neurology outpatient settings. This multicenter study evaluated the consistency of electrodiagnostic findings in chronic axonal polyneuropathy across different clinics. METHODS: We retrospectively collected sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and peroneal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude data from 62 patients with cryptogenic axonal polyneuropathy. Recordings were obtained both in general neurology outpatient clinics and in a specialized neuromuscular center in the Netherlands. After excluding technically inadequate waveforms, we assessed agreement and inter-center variability using Bland-Altman plots, standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), relative inter-trial variation (RIV), concordance rates, and Krippendorff's α. RESULTS: In quality review, 22% of sural and 2% of peroneal recordings from general neurology clinics were either reclassified or excluded because of a technically inadequate waveform. Inter-center variability was substantial for sural SNAP (ICC 0.49; RIV -200% to 200%; SEM 81%) and peroneal CMAP amplitudes (ICC 0.82; RIV -78% to 110%; SEM 37%). Agreement was poor for the classification of sural SNAP (concordance rate 69%; Krippendorff's α 0.36) and peroneal CMAP (concordance rate 73%; Krippendorff's α 0.45) as normal/abnormal, and for the electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy (concordance rate 71%; Krippendorff's α -0.15). DISCUSSION: In everyday clinical practice, substantial variability in sural SNAP and peroneal CMAP amplitudes limits consistent electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy. Our findings underscore the necessity of rigorous quality control during nerve conduction studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Muscle & Nerve
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.70236
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability of Sural SNAP and Peroneal CMAP Amplitudes Limits Consistent Electrodiagnosis of Chronic Axonal Polyneuropathy: A Cross‐Sectional Multicenter Study

H. Stephan Goedee, Alexander F. J. E. Vrancken, Ruben P. A. van Eijk, G Star et al.
Muscle & Nerve
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Variability of Sural SNAP and Peroneal CMAP Amplitudes Limits Consistent Electrodiagnosis of Chronic Axonal Polyneuropathy: A Cross‐Sectional Multicenter Study

H. Stephan Goedee, Alexander F. J. E. Vrancken, Ruben P. A. van Eijk, G Star, Nicolette C. Notermans, Pieter A. van Doorn, Laurien L. Teunissen
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Current consensus guidelines for the electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy derive from highly standardized investigations performed in specialist centers, raising the question of whether they are equally applicable in everyday general neurology outpatient settings. This multicenter study evaluated the consistency of electrodiagnostic findings in chronic axonal polyneuropathy across different clinics. METHODS: We retrospectively collected sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and peroneal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude data from 62 patients with cryptogenic axonal polyneuropathy. Recordings were obtained both in general neurology outpatient clinics and in a specialized neuromuscular center in the Netherlands. After excluding technically inadequate waveforms, we assessed agreement and inter-center variability using Bland-Altman plots, standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), relative inter-trial variation (RIV), concordance rates, and Krippendorff's α. RESULTS: In quality review, 22% of sural and 2% of peroneal recordings from general neurology clinics were either reclassified or excluded because of a technically inadequate waveform. Inter-center variability was substantial for sural SNAP (ICC 0.49; RIV -200% to 200%; SEM 81%) and peroneal CMAP amplitudes (ICC 0.82; RIV -78% to 110%; SEM 37%). Agreement was poor for the classification of sural SNAP (concordance rate 69%; Krippendorff's α 0.36) and peroneal CMAP (concordance rate 73%; Krippendorff's α 0.45) as normal/abnormal, and for the electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy (concordance rate 71%; Krippendorff's α -0.15). DISCUSSION: In everyday clinical practice, substantial variability in sural SNAP and peroneal CMAP amplitudes limits consistent electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy. Our findings underscore the necessity of rigorous quality control during nerve conduction studies.

Muscle & Nerve
Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.