Peace in an era of global war(ming)

We have long imagined peace as a shield cast over serene landscapes, protecting us from war’s responsibility and its wounds. Yet this illusion crumbles under recent findings in environmental science, which reveal that the militaries of nations heralded as symbols of peace, such as the United States and NATO are the largest contributors to climate change today, devastating health, ecosystems, and communities across both conflict-affected and seemingly peaceful regions. This cross-border environmental destruction is so profound that, from an ecological perspective, the distinction between peace and war landscapes has effectively dissolved. Yet our collective imagination remains anchored in an outdated dichotomy, confining war victims to visibly scarred regions while perceiving those outside these areas as secure, thriving, and detached from accountability. Consequently, it prevents individuals from recognizing their exposure to war’s harm and hinders the emergence of activist positions rooted in an understanding of our shared and precarious contemporary trajectory. This paper addresses this gap by examining three analytical lenses applied to the same contemporary landscapes: political philosophy, which traditionally conceptualizes landscapes in territorial terms divided between zones of peace and war; environmental science, which exposes the ecological consequences of militarization that transcend territorial and temporal boundaries; and contemporary autobiographical literature, which, through the personal gaze on one’s home landscape, reconciles these perspectives, shaping a new way of inhabiting the ecopolitical realities of the 21st century. Through this interdisciplinary approach, this article introduces a new category of victims: “The Unknowing Fallen”, individuals living beneath seemingly “peaceful” landscapes yet suffering from the ecological destruction caused by historical, distant, and future conflicts. Building on this concept, it proposes a framework that recognizes our shared vulnerability and complicity, calling for a paradigm shift that unites ecological justice and peacemaking as an urgent and unified global imperative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06975-w
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peace in an era of global war(ming)

Hadas Zahavi
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Health and Conflict Studies
article

Peace in an era of global war(ming)

Hadas Zahavi
article en

Abstract

We have long imagined peace as a shield cast over serene landscapes, protecting us from war’s responsibility and its wounds. Yet this illusion crumbles under recent findings in environmental science, which reveal that the militaries of nations heralded as symbols of peace, such as the United States and NATO are the largest contributors to climate change today, devastating health, ecosystems, and communities across both conflict-affected and seemingly peaceful regions. This cross-border environmental destruction is so profound that, from an ecological perspective, the distinction between peace and war landscapes has effectively dissolved. Yet our collective imagination remains anchored in an outdated dichotomy, confining war victims to visibly scarred regions while perceiving those outside these areas as secure, thriving, and detached from accountability. Consequently, it prevents individuals from recognizing their exposure to war’s harm and hinders the emergence of activist positions rooted in an understanding of our shared and precarious contemporary trajectory. This paper addresses this gap by examining three analytical lenses applied to the same contemporary landscapes: political philosophy, which traditionally conceptualizes landscapes in territorial terms divided between zones of peace and war; environmental science, which exposes the ecological consequences of militarization that transcend territorial and temporal boundaries; and contemporary autobiographical literature, which, through the personal gaze on one’s home landscape, reconciles these perspectives, shaping a new way of inhabiting the ecopolitical realities of the 21st century. Through this interdisciplinary approach, this article introduces a new category of victims: “The Unknowing Fallen”, individuals living beneath seemingly “peaceful” landscapes yet suffering from the ecological destruction caused by historical, distant, and future conflicts. Building on this concept, it proposes a framework that recognizes our shared vulnerability and complicity, calling for a paradigm shift that unites ecological justice and peacemaking as an urgent and unified global imperative.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health and Conflict Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.