Predicting reading outcomes in school starters using a computer assisted dynamic assessment of decoding

Early and accurate identification of children at risk of reading difficulties is essential for ensuring timely and appropriate educational support. Traditional screening tools are static, measuring only current knowledge. As a result, poor performance may reflect either a specific learning difficulty such as dyslexia or limited prior learning opportunities, making accurate identification challenging. This study examined the potential of a computer-assisted Dynamic Assessment (DA) of decoding, which measures learning potential through responsiveness to training, as an alternative approach. In a longitudinal study, 317 reception-aged children (mean age 5 years 3 months) completed the DA of decoding along with static assessments of reading, related skills, and non-verbal ability. Ten months later, 286 of these children were reassessed on the measures of word reading. The DA of decoding accounted for significant unique variance in later word reading and demonstrated excellent classification accuracy in identifying children at risk of dyslexia. For children with English as an Additional Language (EAL), combining the DA with static measures resulted in perfect classification accuracy. Further analysis of a sub-sample of non-readers suggests that administering the DA earlier in the school year could increase its predictive value for all learners. These findings support the use of DA of decoding as a promising early screening tool, particularly for culturally and linguistically diverse children who may be misidentified by traditional static assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading and Writing
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10758-1
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting reading outcomes in school starters using a computer assisted dynamic assessment of decoding

Anna Weighall, Anna Steenberg Gellert, Chris Dixon, Emily Oxley et al.
Reading and Writing
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Predicting reading outcomes in school starters using a computer assisted dynamic assessment of decoding

Anna Weighall, Anna Steenberg Gellert, Chris Dixon, Emily Oxley, Hannah Nash, Paula J. Clarke
article en

Abstract

Early and accurate identification of children at risk of reading difficulties is essential for ensuring timely and appropriate educational support. Traditional screening tools are static, measuring only current knowledge. As a result, poor performance may reflect either a specific learning difficulty such as dyslexia or limited prior learning opportunities, making accurate identification challenging. This study examined the potential of a computer-assisted Dynamic Assessment (DA) of decoding, which measures learning potential through responsiveness to training, as an alternative approach. In a longitudinal study, 317 reception-aged children (mean age 5 years 3 months) completed the DA of decoding along with static assessments of reading, related skills, and non-verbal ability. Ten months later, 286 of these children were reassessed on the measures of word reading. The DA of decoding accounted for significant unique variance in later word reading and demonstrated excellent classification accuracy in identifying children at risk of dyslexia. For children with English as an Additional Language (EAL), combining the DA with static measures resulted in perfect classification accuracy. Further analysis of a sub-sample of non-readers suggests that administering the DA earlier in the school year could increase its predictive value for all learners. These findings support the use of DA of decoding as a promising early screening tool, particularly for culturally and linguistically diverse children who may be misidentified by traditional static assessments.

Reading and Writing
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Leeds (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Nuffield Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.