Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models

Abstract Accurately simulating the climate system has been a challenge and aspiration since the advent of numerical modeling. Here, we use the spatial pattern of 2 m surface temperature to discuss the evolution of model performance from the beginning of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) in the 1990s to the latest kilometer-scale models today. We find that the kilometer-scale IFS-FESOM model outperforms even the best CMIP6 models, while other kilometer-scale models still have considerable deficits. These results demonstrate the potential of kilometer-scale models to surpass established CMIP models, despite undergoing only limited tuning, while also highlighting the considerable efforts still needed to realize their full potential. We put this performance in the context of 10 observation-based references and 150 coupled global climate models developed over the past three decades to discuss that increasing resolution might be necessary, but is not sufficient for improving model skill.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03497-w
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models

Thomas Rackow, Aiko Voigt, Lukas Brunner, Dian Putrasahan et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate variability and models
article

Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models

Thomas Rackow, Aiko Voigt, Lukas Brunner, Dian Putrasahan, Leopold Haimberger, Reto Knutti, Rohit Ghosh, Cathy Hohenegger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurately simulating the climate system has been a challenge and aspiration since the advent of numerical modeling. Here, we use the spatial pattern of 2 m surface temperature to discuss the evolution of model performance from the beginning of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) in the 1990s to the latest kilometer-scale models today. We find that the kilometer-scale IFS-FESOM model outperforms even the best CMIP6 models, while other kilometer-scale models still have considerable deficits. These results demonstrate the potential of kilometer-scale models to surpass established CMIP models, despite undergoing only limited tuning, while also highlighting the considerable efforts still needed to realize their full potential. We put this performance in the context of 10 observation-based references and 150 coupled global climate models developed over the past three decades to discuss that increasing resolution might be necessary, but is not sufficient for improving model skill.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), University of Vienna (AT), Universität Hamburg (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models — Thomas Rackow, Aiko Voigt, et al. · Communications Earth & Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS