How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

We establish a void-based consistency test for Galileon scalar-tensor theories. We show that the previously reported unphysical breakdown of the predicted Newtonian force in certain Galileon models is controlled by a single condition linking non-linear void dynamics to the cosmic expansion history. This connection yields a redshift-dependent upper bound on the allowed depth of voids and promotes this requirement to a new viability condition, complementary to standard stability criteria. As an example, we apply this void-based criterion to a linear parameterization in the scale factor constrained by theoretical and observational bounds; we find that $\sim 60\%$ of the parameter space is excluded, with most problematic models failing by $z\lesssim 10$. These results position cosmic voids as sharp, complementary and theory-informed filters for viable modified gravity, enabling more informed priors and parameter-space choices in future cosmological inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/nk9f-dw1z
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

Anonymous
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

We establish a void-based consistency test for Galileon scalar-tensor theories. We show that the previously reported unphysical breakdown of the predicted Newtonian force in certain Galileon models is controlled by a single condition linking non-linear void dynamics to the cosmic expansion history. This connection yields a redshift-dependent upper bound on the allowed depth of voids and promotes this requirement to a new viability condition, complementary to standard stability criteria. As an example, we apply this void-based criterion to a linear parameterization in the scale factor constrained by theoretical and observational bounds; we find that $\sim 60\%$ of the parameter space is excluded, with most problematic models failing by $z\lesssim 10$. These results position cosmic voids as sharp, complementary and theory-informed filters for viable modified gravity, enabling more informed priors and parameter-space choices in future cosmological inference.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(10)
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino (IT), Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli (IT), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Flatiron Institute (US), University of Turin (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Simons Foundation, European Commission, European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.