Do Surgical Trainees Impact Surgeon Robotic Learning Curves?

Inter-surgeon variability in robotic surgery learning curves, as well as the impact of trainee involvement and the presence or absence of a formal robotic training curriculum, remain poorly defined. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis is a validated method for evaluating learning curves in robotic surgery. Our study aimed to utilize CUSUM analysis to explore whether surgical trainees affect surgical operating times. We retrospectively analyzed robotic-assisted cholecystectomies performed by 7 surgeons at a single academic institution between 2012 and 2022. A robotic surgery curriculum was implemented in 2016. Cases were ordered chronologically for each surgeon, and CUSUM learning curves were generated using operative time as the outcome. The first peak in the CUSUM curve indicated the completion of the learning phase. Trainee involvement was analyzed by postgraduate year. 707 operations were performed. Five surgeons demonstrated a distinct learning phase, with a learning phase ranging from 20 to 59 cases, whereas two surgeons exhibited baseline proficiency without an identifiable learning phase. Despite consistently high trainee participation (94.5% of cases) and similar distributions of trainee seniority, learning curve variability persisted. Implementation of an institutional robotic training curriculum was not associated with abrupt changes in learning curve trajectories among surgeons. Learning curves in robotic-assisted cholecystectomies are highly variable and surgeon-specific. Implementation of the robotic training program did not influence the overall trajectory of the surgeon's personal learning phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261443689
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Surgical Trainees Impact Surgeon Robotic Learning Curves?

Marc Abou Assali, Juan C. Quispe, S Mirasol, Zachary Tran et al.
The American Surgeon
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Do Surgical Trainees Impact Surgeon Robotic Learning Curves?

Marc Abou Assali, Juan C. Quispe, S Mirasol, Zachary Tran, Esther Wu, Alba Zevallos
article en

Abstract

Inter-surgeon variability in robotic surgery learning curves, as well as the impact of trainee involvement and the presence or absence of a formal robotic training curriculum, remain poorly defined. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis is a validated method for evaluating learning curves in robotic surgery. Our study aimed to utilize CUSUM analysis to explore whether surgical trainees affect surgical operating times. We retrospectively analyzed robotic-assisted cholecystectomies performed by 7 surgeons at a single academic institution between 2012 and 2022. A robotic surgery curriculum was implemented in 2016. Cases were ordered chronologically for each surgeon, and CUSUM learning curves were generated using operative time as the outcome. The first peak in the CUSUM curve indicated the completion of the learning phase. Trainee involvement was analyzed by postgraduate year. 707 operations were performed. Five surgeons demonstrated a distinct learning phase, with a learning phase ranging from 20 to 59 cases, whereas two surgeons exhibited baseline proficiency without an identifiable learning phase. Despite consistently high trainee participation (94.5% of cases) and similar distributions of trainee seniority, learning curve variability persisted. Implementation of an institutional robotic training curriculum was not associated with abrupt changes in learning curve trajectories among surgeons. Learning curves in robotic-assisted cholecystectomies are highly variable and surgeon-specific. Implementation of the robotic training program did not influence the overall trajectory of the surgeon's personal learning phase.

The American Surgeon
Loma Linda University Medical Center (US), Loma Linda University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.