Individual versus collective associative learning in ants

Although associative learning has been traditionally studied at the individual level, it may also operate in group contexts, particularly in social species such as ants. This study investigated whether colonies of Temnothorax rugatulus ants exhibit collective learning-defined as group-level information acquisition emerging from dynamic individual learning-by examining whether individuals learn more effectively in a colony than alone. Using a visual associative learning paradigm, we trained ants to associate a visual cue with food availability and compared performance between isolated individuals and colonies. We tested subjects across 17 sessions, comprising acquisition and reversal phases, and quantified performance based on the time spent at correct versus incorrect cues. Our results revealed that ants trained in colonies learnt associations more rapidly than those trained alone during both phases. Additionally, observations showed that colony-trained ants spent more time in correct corridors during training and engaged in more tandem runs early in learning. These findings suggest that social interactions-particularly recruitment behaviour-enhance associative learning of individual ants in colonies. This study underscores the importance of considering the social environment in learning research and suggests that collective learning may be an adaptive mechanism in social animals. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of collective intelligence'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0442
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
61.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual versus collective associative learning in ants

Takao Sasaki, Federico Sanabria, Matthew Gildea, Adam Kissai et al.
3 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
61.36
article

Individual versus collective associative learning in ants

Takao Sasaki, Federico Sanabria, Matthew Gildea, Adam Kissai, Brissa Gutierrez, Ayana Usui
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Although associative learning has been traditionally studied at the individual level, it may also operate in group contexts, particularly in social species such as ants. This study investigated whether colonies of Temnothorax rugatulus ants exhibit collective learning-defined as group-level information acquisition emerging from dynamic individual learning-by examining whether individuals learn more effectively in a colony than alone. Using a visual associative learning paradigm, we trained ants to associate a visual cue with food availability and compared performance between isolated individuals and colonies. We tested subjects across 17 sessions, comprising acquisition and reversal phases, and quantified performance based on the time spent at correct versus incorrect cues. Our results revealed that ants trained in colonies learnt associations more rapidly than those trained alone during both phases. Additionally, observations showed that colony-trained ants spent more time in correct corridors during training and engaged in more tandem runs early in learning. These findings suggest that social interactions-particularly recruitment behaviour-enhance associative learning of individual ants in colonies. This study underscores the importance of considering the social environment in learning research and suggests that collective learning may be an adaptive mechanism in social animals. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of collective intelligence'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 381(1948)
Waseda University (JP), University of Rochester (US), Arizona State University (US), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
61.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.