Glycemic Status and Elective Surgery Risk: Clinically Recognized Hyperglycemia Versus Diabetes Diagnosis Alone in a National Cohort

BACKGROUND: Diabetes affects 20%-25% of surgical patients, but whether elective surgery should be deferred for patients with diabetes absent clinically recognized hyperglycemia remains unclear. We evaluated perioperative risk by glycemic status in adults undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2022. Adults undergoing elective joint arthroplasty, lumbar spine fusion, cholecystectomy, colectomy, cardiac surgery, or hysterectomy were classified as no diabetes, diabetes without hyperglycemia, or diabetes with hyperglycemia using ICD-10-CM codes. The primary endpoint was composite major adverse events (mortality, acute kidney injury, sepsis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or venous thromboembolism). Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographics, payer, procedure type, year, hospital characteristics, and Elixhauser comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 2,104,338 hospitalizations (~10.5 million weighted), 1,641,797 (78.0%) had no diabetes, 398,095 (18.9%) had diabetes without hyperglycemia, and 64,446 (3.1%) had diabetes with hyperglycemia. Adjusted major adverse event probability was 5.31% for no diabetes, 5.85% for diabetes without hyperglycemia, and 9.16% for diabetes with hyperglycemia. Diabetes without hyperglycemia was associated with modestly increased odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15; absolute risk difference 0.55%; number needed to harm 183) and ranked 16th of 17 surgical risk factors examined. Diabetes with hyperglycemia was associated with substantially higher risk (aOR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.94-2.05; absolute risk difference 3.85%; number needed to harm 26). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes without clinically recognized hyperglycemia was a comparatively weak risk factor, whereas clinically recognized hyperglycemia identified substantially higher perioperative risk. These findings suggest glycemic status may better inform elective surgical risk stratification than diabetes diagnosis alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000001981
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glycemic Status and Elective Surgery Risk: Clinically Recognized Hyperglycemia Versus Diabetes Diagnosis Alone in a National Cohort

Michael S. Wong, Brenden Tu, Beshoy Saad, Solomon Kim et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Glycemic Status and Elective Surgery Risk: Clinically Recognized Hyperglycemia Versus Diabetes Diagnosis Alone in a National Cohort

Michael S. Wong, Brenden Tu, Beshoy Saad, Solomon Kim, Gizele Bracamontes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes affects 20%-25% of surgical patients, but whether elective surgery should be deferred for patients with diabetes absent clinically recognized hyperglycemia remains unclear. We evaluated perioperative risk by glycemic status in adults undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2022. Adults undergoing elective joint arthroplasty, lumbar spine fusion, cholecystectomy, colectomy, cardiac surgery, or hysterectomy were classified as no diabetes, diabetes without hyperglycemia, or diabetes with hyperglycemia using ICD-10-CM codes. The primary endpoint was composite major adverse events (mortality, acute kidney injury, sepsis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or venous thromboembolism). Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographics, payer, procedure type, year, hospital characteristics, and Elixhauser comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 2,104,338 hospitalizations (~10.5 million weighted), 1,641,797 (78.0%) had no diabetes, 398,095 (18.9%) had diabetes without hyperglycemia, and 64,446 (3.1%) had diabetes with hyperglycemia. Adjusted major adverse event probability was 5.31% for no diabetes, 5.85% for diabetes without hyperglycemia, and 9.16% for diabetes with hyperglycemia. Diabetes without hyperglycemia was associated with modestly increased odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15; absolute risk difference 0.55%; number needed to harm 183) and ranked 16th of 17 surgical risk factors examined. Diabetes with hyperglycemia was associated with substantially higher risk (aOR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.94-2.05; absolute risk difference 3.85%; number needed to harm 26). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes without clinically recognized hyperglycemia was a comparatively weak risk factor, whereas clinically recognized hyperglycemia identified substantially higher perioperative risk. These findings suggest glycemic status may better inform elective surgical risk stratification than diabetes diagnosis alone.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
California Northstate University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.