AI-driven resource allocation in cloud computing: a systematic review revealing critical sustainability and evaluation gaps

Abstract This systematic literature review analyzes AI-driven resource allocation in cloud computing through comprehensive analysis of 63 high-quality studies selected via PRISMA 2020 methodology from an initial collection of 485 papers. Our taxonomic framework categorizes approaches across four dimensions: algorithmic methods, deployment environments, optimization objectives, and evaluation methods. Quantitative analysis demonstrates substantial AI superiority over traditional approaches: $$\approx $$ 45% average latency reduction (range 11−77.7%) from 10 studies with quantifiable latency data, 32% cost savings (range 10–48%) from 6 studies with quantifiable cost data, and 35% energy efficiency improvements (range 3.68–71%) from 16 studies with energy measurements. Reinforcement learning dominates the field (40% of studies) with particular effectiveness in dynamic environments, while hybrid approaches demonstrate superior multi-objective optimization. Critical research gaps include minimal carbon-aware scheduling integration (only 4 studies, 6.3% of corpus), over-reliance on simulation environments (70% of evaluations), and absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. The limited availability of quantifiable performance data across studies reveals a significant methodological gap in current research evaluation practices. We identify five high-priority research directions and provide actionable recommendations for advancing production-ready AI-driven cloud resource management systems that balance performance, sustainability, and practical deployment requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computing
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-026-01655-8
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-driven resource allocation in cloud computing: a systematic review revealing critical sustainability and evaluation gaps

Shahzeb Alam, Rab Nawaz, Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Atif Ramzan et al.
Computing
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

AI-driven resource allocation in cloud computing: a systematic review revealing critical sustainability and evaluation gaps

Shahzeb Alam, Rab Nawaz, Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Atif Ramzan, Ziaullah, Ubaid Ullah, Rahmat Ullah
article en

Abstract

Abstract This systematic literature review analyzes AI-driven resource allocation in cloud computing through comprehensive analysis of 63 high-quality studies selected via PRISMA 2020 methodology from an initial collection of 485 papers. Our taxonomic framework categorizes approaches across four dimensions: algorithmic methods, deployment environments, optimization objectives, and evaluation methods. Quantitative analysis demonstrates substantial AI superiority over traditional approaches: $$\approx $$ 45% average latency reduction (range 11−77.7%) from 10 studies with quantifiable latency data, 32% cost savings (range 10–48%) from 6 studies with quantifiable cost data, and 35% energy efficiency improvements (range 3.68–71%) from 16 studies with energy measurements. Reinforcement learning dominates the field (40% of studies) with particular effectiveness in dynamic environments, while hybrid approaches demonstrate superior multi-objective optimization. Critical research gaps include minimal carbon-aware scheduling integration (only 4 studies, 6.3% of corpus), over-reliance on simulation environments (70% of evaluations), and absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. The limited availability of quantifiable performance data across studies reveals a significant methodological gap in current research evaluation practices. We identify five high-priority research directions and provide actionable recommendations for advancing production-ready AI-driven cloud resource management systems that balance performance, sustainability, and practical deployment requirements.

ComputingVol. 108(5)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.