Demineralized Bone Matrix Fiber Allograft Augmentation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus correction has demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, there are occasions where there is limited bone formation and remodelling despite successful union. This study investigated whether demineralised bone matrix fibre allograft augmentation could be associated with greater radiographic bone formation compared with standard percutaneous technique. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of patients undergoing fourth-generation percutaneous hallux valgus correction with demineralised bone matrix fibre allograft augmentation (DBM group) or without (NDBM group). Primary outcome was radiographic healing assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months using a validated classification system. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire [MOXFQ], EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level [EQ-5D-5L], visual analogue scale [VAS] Pain), and radiographic parameters (intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle). RESULTS: > .05). Multivariable regression analysis adjusting for baseline confounders found that DBM was associated with a statistically but not clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; based on the minimal clinically important difference); however, PROM findings should be interpreted cautiously, given baseline imbalance and approximately 50% loss to follow-up. The additional cost of bone graft augmentation was USD$1780 per procedure. CONCLUSION: The addition of demineralised bone matrix fibre allograft to the lateral healing zone, was associated with higher radiographic healing scores and a greater proportion classified radiographically as united at scheduled time points following percutaneous hallux valgus surgery. Future studies should investigate whether other biological adjuncts could further optimize healing in specific patient populations or identify those that may not demonstrate bony remodelling.
Authors
- Min Jia Chua (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6818-3067)
- Andreas Toepfer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-9637)
- Lily Fletcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-2604)
- Evelyn Murphy
- P. Lam
- Thomas L. Lewis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-7427)
- Clare Watt
Institutions
- Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
- Arthritis Australia (AU)
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Foot & Ankle International
- Published
- 2026-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261419119
- Primary Topic
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00