New Treatment in Haemophilia: Challenges, Controversies and Uncertainties

The therapeutic landscape for haemophilia is rapidly evolving beyond traditional factor replacement to include nonfactor therapies and adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy. These innovations promise effective, long-term prophylaxis with reduced treatment burden but introduce new complexities in clinical management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of these emerging treatments, focusing on key practical challenges. For nonfactor therapies-including emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab and fitusiran-critical considerations for bleed management, surgical procedures, and transitioning between products, emphasizing that these agents are for prophylaxis only and require specific, often product-specific, concomitant factor or bypassing agent protocols for acute haemostasis. We further examine the safety profiles of these agents, with a focus on thrombotic risk, which can arise from drug-drug interactions, an excessive procoagulant effect, or the unmasking of baseline risk factors. Immunogenicity, while less frequent than with traditional factors, remains a consideration requiring ongoing pharmacovigilance. Finally, we address the central immunogenicity challenge in AAV gene therapy: managing cytotoxic T-cell-mediated hepatotoxicity that can threaten transgene expression. The role of corticosteroid immunomodulation-both prophylactic and reactive-is explored across clinical trials for haemophilia A and B, highlighting variable responses and the need for tailored strategies. This review synthesizes current evidence to help clinicians navigate this new therapeutic era, optimizing outcomes while mitigating the risks associated with these transformative treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haemophilia
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70254
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Treatment in Haemophilia: Challenges, Controversies and Uncertainties

Guy A. Young, M C Ozelo, P Chowdary
Haemophilia
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

New Treatment in Haemophilia: Challenges, Controversies and Uncertainties

Guy A. Young, M C Ozelo, P Chowdary
article en

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape for haemophilia is rapidly evolving beyond traditional factor replacement to include nonfactor therapies and adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy. These innovations promise effective, long-term prophylaxis with reduced treatment burden but introduce new complexities in clinical management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of these emerging treatments, focusing on key practical challenges. For nonfactor therapies-including emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab and fitusiran-critical considerations for bleed management, surgical procedures, and transitioning between products, emphasizing that these agents are for prophylaxis only and require specific, often product-specific, concomitant factor or bypassing agent protocols for acute haemostasis. We further examine the safety profiles of these agents, with a focus on thrombotic risk, which can arise from drug-drug interactions, an excessive procoagulant effect, or the unmasking of baseline risk factors. Immunogenicity, while less frequent than with traditional factors, remains a consideration requiring ongoing pharmacovigilance. Finally, we address the central immunogenicity challenge in AAV gene therapy: managing cytotoxic T-cell-mediated hepatotoxicity that can threaten transgene expression. The role of corticosteroid immunomodulation-both prophylactic and reactive-is explored across clinical trials for haemophilia A and B, highlighting variable responses and the need for tailored strategies. This review synthesizes current evidence to help clinicians navigate this new therapeutic era, optimizing outcomes while mitigating the risks associated with these transformative treatments.

Haemophilia
University of Southern California (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.