A qualitative study on the participation experience in a mental health recovery program based on WHO QualityRights in South Korea

Introduction: , was culturally and clinically adapted for local use, incorporating Open Dialogue principles. This adaptation led to the development of the group-based "QualityRights Recovery Program." This study examines the experiences and perspectives of individuals with lived experience of mental health challenges, their family caregivers, and mental health practitioners who participated in this program to inform the local implementation of recovery-oriented mental health practices. Methods: Eighteen participants were recruited from two mental health facilities in Suwon, Republic of Korea. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to examine participants' experiences with the 13-week QualityRights Recovery Program, which was adapted for the Korean clinical context. Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) participation and engagement in recovery, (2) changes in communication and decision-making, (3) mutual understanding and shifts in perception, and (4) redefining recovery concepts and therapeutic aims. Conclusion: Participants' perspectives on the QualityRights Recovery Program indicate its potential to restore the autonomy and well-being of individuals with lived experience, while also positively influencing the perspectives of their caregivers and practitioners. These findings provide guidance for expanding rights-based, recovery-oriented mental health interventions in Korea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1782854
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative study on the participation experience in a mental health recovery program based on WHO QualityRights in South Korea

Yong Hyuk Cho, Jin Kim, Shin Kwon Kim, Anna You et al.
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

A qualitative study on the participation experience in a mental health recovery program based on WHO QualityRights in South Korea

Yong Hyuk Cho, Jin Kim, Shin Kwon Kim, Anna You, Hanna Lim, Seongsu Kim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: , was culturally and clinically adapted for local use, incorporating Open Dialogue principles. This adaptation led to the development of the group-based "QualityRights Recovery Program." This study examines the experiences and perspectives of individuals with lived experience of mental health challenges, their family caregivers, and mental health practitioners who participated in this program to inform the local implementation of recovery-oriented mental health practices. Methods: Eighteen participants were recruited from two mental health facilities in Suwon, Republic of Korea. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to examine participants' experiences with the 13-week QualityRights Recovery Program, which was adapted for the Korean clinical context. Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) participation and engagement in recovery, (2) changes in communication and decision-making, (3) mutual understanding and shifts in perception, and (4) redefining recovery concepts and therapeutic aims. Conclusion: Participants' perspectives on the QualityRights Recovery Program indicate its potential to restore the autonomy and well-being of individuals with lived experience, while also positively influencing the perspectives of their caregivers and practitioners. These findings provide guidance for expanding rights-based, recovery-oriented mental health interventions in Korea.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
Daewon Pharm (South Korea) (KR), Ajou University Hospital (KR), Gwangmyeong Mental Health Welfare Center (KR), The Dialogue (US), Ajou University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.