Prioritizing Clinically Relevant Criteria for Longitudinal Obesity Management: A Systemic Framework to Support Decision-Making

Obesity is a multifactorial chronic condition characterised by the interplay of biological, behavioural, psychological, and environmental factors, as well as barriers that influence treatment adherence. This study aimed to identify, organise, and prioritise criteria for obesity management by proposing a systemic framework to support clinical decision-making. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria related to obesity etiology, its consequences, barriers, and motivations for treatment. These criteria were then evaluated by an expert panel. Expert judgements were translated into linguistic scales within a fuzzy environment, and consensus was validated using the Fuzzy Delphi method. The Fuzzy TOPSIS method was then applied to calculate proximity coefficients and rank the criteria across two dimensions: importance and applicability. These dimensions were subsequently unified to generate a consolidated prioritisation for data collection. The results highlight the centrality of dietary, emotional, and treatment-adherence factors, reinforcing the need to approach obesity from a multifactorial, non-reductionist perspective. The proposed framework supports planning clinical, surgical, and public health interventions, as well as the development of decision-support systems for longitudinal obesity management. Importantly, the framework does not diminish the relevance of endocrine and genetic mechanisms in obesity but prioritises criteria that are operationally feasible for routine clinical decision support systems, particularly in real-world and multidisciplinary obesity care settings. • A systemic framework operationalizes obesity as a multifactorial condition. • Adherence and continuity emerged as central drivers in obesity management. • Clinically relevant obesity criteria were validated and prioritized by experts. • A multicriteria approach structured and prioritized the obesity management criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Surgery
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08652-y
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing Clinically Relevant Criteria for Longitudinal Obesity Management: A Systemic Framework to Support Decision-Making

Osíris Canciglieri, Rodrigo Strobel, ERICA LUISA CORREA, Jones Luís Schaefer
Obesity Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Prioritizing Clinically Relevant Criteria for Longitudinal Obesity Management: A Systemic Framework to Support Decision-Making

Osíris Canciglieri, Rodrigo Strobel, ERICA LUISA CORREA, Jones Luís Schaefer
article en

Abstract

Obesity is a multifactorial chronic condition characterised by the interplay of biological, behavioural, psychological, and environmental factors, as well as barriers that influence treatment adherence. This study aimed to identify, organise, and prioritise criteria for obesity management by proposing a systemic framework to support clinical decision-making. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria related to obesity etiology, its consequences, barriers, and motivations for treatment. These criteria were then evaluated by an expert panel. Expert judgements were translated into linguistic scales within a fuzzy environment, and consensus was validated using the Fuzzy Delphi method. The Fuzzy TOPSIS method was then applied to calculate proximity coefficients and rank the criteria across two dimensions: importance and applicability. These dimensions were subsequently unified to generate a consolidated prioritisation for data collection. The results highlight the centrality of dietary, emotional, and treatment-adherence factors, reinforcing the need to approach obesity from a multifactorial, non-reductionist perspective. The proposed framework supports planning clinical, surgical, and public health interventions, as well as the development of decision-support systems for longitudinal obesity management. Importantly, the framework does not diminish the relevance of endocrine and genetic mechanisms in obesity but prioritises criteria that are operationally feasible for routine clinical decision support systems, particularly in real-world and multidisciplinary obesity care settings. • A systemic framework operationalizes obesity as a multifactorial condition. • Adherence and continuity emerged as central drivers in obesity management. • Clinically relevant obesity criteria were validated and prioritized by experts. • A multicriteria approach structured and prioritized the obesity management criteria.

Obesity Surgery
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Hospital Universitário Cajuru (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.