Home-based, virtually supported multimodal prehabilitation compared with usual care prior to major surgery: a multicentre, pragmatic pilot randomised trial

Background: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial of virtually supported, home-based prehabilitation is required to evaluate effectiveness in generalisable settings; however, feasibility is unknown. Methods: This was a pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre internal pilot randomised controlled trial. Adults aged 18 years or older preparing for planned, inpatient non-cardiac, non-orthopaedic surgery were recruited from surgeons' offices at five Canadian centres (30 January to 11 July 2024). Participants were randomised to a virtually supported home-based prehabilitation programme (exercise, protein supplementation, psychosocial support) delivered by trained coaches using a theory-based approach, or to usual care. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment (target >6 participants/centre/month), adherence (>75%), and outcome completeness (>90%). Barriers and facilitators were assessed using a validated Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) survey. Cluster analyses explored patterns of TDF responses and associations with adherence. Results: <0.001) and explained 28% of observed variation in adherence to prehabilitation. Conclusions: A pragmatic, multicentre trial of virtually supported home-based multimodal prehabilitation is feasible. Findings support progression to a fully powered trial. Observed associations between perceived barriers, facilitators, and adherence should be validated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06042491.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJA Open
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100550
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home-based, virtually supported multimodal prehabilitation compared with usual care prior to major surgery: a multicentre, pragmatic pilot randomised trial

Chelsia Gillis, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Puneeta Tandon, S H Lee et al.
BJA Open
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Home-based, virtually supported multimodal prehabilitation compared with usual care prior to major surgery: a multicentre, pragmatic pilot randomised trial

Chelsia Gillis, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Puneeta Tandon, S H Lee, Monica Taljaard, Gurlavine Kidd, Daniel I. McIsaac, Julie Hallet
article en

Abstract

Background: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial of virtually supported, home-based prehabilitation is required to evaluate effectiveness in generalisable settings; however, feasibility is unknown. Methods: This was a pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre internal pilot randomised controlled trial. Adults aged 18 years or older preparing for planned, inpatient non-cardiac, non-orthopaedic surgery were recruited from surgeons' offices at five Canadian centres (30 January to 11 July 2024). Participants were randomised to a virtually supported home-based prehabilitation programme (exercise, protein supplementation, psychosocial support) delivered by trained coaches using a theory-based approach, or to usual care. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment (target >6 participants/centre/month), adherence (>75%), and outcome completeness (>90%). Barriers and facilitators were assessed using a validated Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) survey. Cluster analyses explored patterns of TDF responses and associations with adherence. Results: <0.001) and explained 28% of observed variation in adherence to prehabilitation. Conclusions: A pragmatic, multicentre trial of virtually supported home-based multimodal prehabilitation is feasible. Findings support progression to a fully powered trial. Observed associations between perceived barriers, facilitators, and adherence should be validated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06042491.

BJA OpenVol. 18
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Royal Columbian Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), St Michael’s Hospital (IE), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), McGill University (CA)
University of Ottawa, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.