Visualizing and Quantifying Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation: A Pilot Physiological Study

INTRODUCTION: Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch is common in lung transplant recipients, particularly during the early postoperative period. It may lead to impaired gas exchange and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a novel bedside imaging modality, facilitating the real-time regional assessment of V/Q mismatch. This pilot study aimed to visualize and quantify V/Q mismatch using EIT in lung transplant recipients during the early postoperative period. METHODS: This pilot single-center retrospective study included ten recipients following lung transplantation (5 single lung transplantation (SLT) and 5 bilateral lung transplantation (BLT)). During mechanical ventilation, the regional ventilation and perfusion were evaluated using EIT in the first 5 postoperative days. V/Q mismatch was quantified by calculating the percentages of only ventilated units, only perfused units, and unmatched units as well as the fractions of wasted ventilation and wasted perfusion. RESULTS: The SLT recipients exhibited a significantly higher percentage of only ventilated units than the BLT recipients (2.9% [2.8, 3.2] vs. 0.8% [0.0, 1.0], p = .012). In contrast, the BLT recipients showed a numerically higher percentage of only perfused units (28.8% [28.8, 34.1] vs. 19.4% [19.3, 19.4], p = .095). Moreover, the percentages of unmatched units, fractions of wasted ventilation, and fractions of wasted perfusion were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Distinct V/Q patterns for the SLT and BLT recipients were observed. This highlights the need for individualized ventilatory strategies to optimize postoperative respiratory management in lung transplant recipients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Proceedings
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2026.04.011
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualizing and Quantifying Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation: A Pilot Physiological Study

Kazuki Fujishiro, Chihiro Konoeda, Akinori Maeda, Ryota Inokuchi et al.
Transplantation Proceedings
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Visualizing and Quantifying Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation: A Pilot Physiological Study

Kazuki Fujishiro, Chihiro Konoeda, Akinori Maeda, Ryota Inokuchi, Masaaki Sato, Miyuki Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Hattammaru, Mitsuaki Kawashima, Daisuke Takai, Kent Doi
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch is common in lung transplant recipients, particularly during the early postoperative period. It may lead to impaired gas exchange and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a novel bedside imaging modality, facilitating the real-time regional assessment of V/Q mismatch. This pilot study aimed to visualize and quantify V/Q mismatch using EIT in lung transplant recipients during the early postoperative period. METHODS: This pilot single-center retrospective study included ten recipients following lung transplantation (5 single lung transplantation (SLT) and 5 bilateral lung transplantation (BLT)). During mechanical ventilation, the regional ventilation and perfusion were evaluated using EIT in the first 5 postoperative days. V/Q mismatch was quantified by calculating the percentages of only ventilated units, only perfused units, and unmatched units as well as the fractions of wasted ventilation and wasted perfusion. RESULTS: The SLT recipients exhibited a significantly higher percentage of only ventilated units than the BLT recipients (2.9% [2.8, 3.2] vs. 0.8% [0.0, 1.0], p = .012). In contrast, the BLT recipients showed a numerically higher percentage of only perfused units (28.8% [28.8, 34.1] vs. 19.4% [19.3, 19.4], p = .095). Moreover, the percentages of unmatched units, fractions of wasted ventilation, and fractions of wasted perfusion were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Distinct V/Q patterns for the SLT and BLT recipients were observed. This highlights the need for individualized ventilatory strategies to optimize postoperative respiratory management in lung transplant recipients.

Transplantation ProceedingsVol. 58(4)
University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.