Evaluation of large language models with clinical guidance for vetting outpatient magnetic resonance imaging lumbar spine referrals
= 0.68). Claude Opus with the full prompt achieved the highest accuracy (0.86) for vetting outcomes. GPT-4 with the instruction-only prompt achieved the highest F1 score (0.88) for contraindication detection. LLMs completed the task substantially faster than radiologists (9.8 ± 1.0 vs 135.0 ± 45.0 min).ConclusionsLLMs demonstrate promising performance in vetting radiological referrals for sciatica, particularly with detailed context. All models identified all urgent referrals, suggesting potential for prioritising vetting worklists and improving timeliness of care.
Authors
- Antanas Kascenas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-3988)
- Alison Q. ONeil
- William Clackett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-0135)
- Hannah Watson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-0647)
- Avinash Kumar Kanodia
- Hatim Alsusa
- Oliver T Barry
- David Scott
Institutions
- NHS Tayside (GB)
- Canon (France) (FR)
- Canon Medical Systems Corporation (Japan) (JP)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scottish Medical Journal
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330261441582
- Primary Topic
- Radiology practices and education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00