Advancing medical education in a mental health trust: residents’ and medical students’ perspectives: qualitative study

AIMS AND METHOD: This study aimed to explore the educational experiences of medical students and psychiatry residents within a large mental health trust, identifying areas for improvement. A qualitative methodology using four focus groups was employed, grouped by training level: medical students, foundation doctors, core psychiatry residents and higher-specialty residents. Discussions were guided by a standardised topic guide and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Participants highlighted key issues including induction length and quality, access to written information, rota gaps and inadequate facilities; challenges in achieving psychotherapy competencies, teaching inconsistency, lack of supervision and insufficient development of non-clinical skills were also noted. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Enhancement of induction, supervision, psychotherapy training and non-clinical skills development can significantly improve psychiatric education. Addressing structural and systemic issues will strengthen trainee experience and support high-quality patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2026.10232
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing medical education in a mental health trust: residents’ and medical students’ perspectives: qualitative study

Bruce Tamilson, Michelle Keag
BJPsych Bulletin
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Advancing medical education in a mental health trust: residents’ and medical students’ perspectives: qualitative study

Bruce Tamilson, Michelle Keag
article en

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD: This study aimed to explore the educational experiences of medical students and psychiatry residents within a large mental health trust, identifying areas for improvement. A qualitative methodology using four focus groups was employed, grouped by training level: medical students, foundation doctors, core psychiatry residents and higher-specialty residents. Discussions were guided by a standardised topic guide and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Participants highlighted key issues including induction length and quality, access to written information, rota gaps and inadequate facilities; challenges in achieving psychotherapy competencies, teaching inconsistency, lack of supervision and insufficient development of non-clinical skills were also noted. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Enhancement of induction, supervision, psychotherapy training and non-clinical skills development can significantly improve psychiatric education. Addressing structural and systemic issues will strengthen trainee experience and support high-quality patient care.

BJPsych Bulletin
St George's, University of London (GB), South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.