Injectable Bone Cements: A Generational Framework for Bioactivity, Porosity, and Mechanobiological Design at the Nanoscale

Injectable bone cements (IBCs) are widely used in orthopaedic and craniofacial applications due to their minimally invasive delivery and ability to provide early mechanical stabilisation. Despite substantial progress, clinical translation remains limited by persistent challenges, including insufficient bioactivity, poor control of porosity and interconnectivity, and the limited integration of mechanobiological design principles. Additional constraints arise from the need to balance injectability, setting behaviour, and mechanical performance. Most existing reviews categorise IBCs by material composition, often overlooking important conceptual advances in functionality. Here, we propose a generation‐based classification framework that captures successive shifts in injectable cement design, from first‐generation bioinert structural fillers to second‐generation resorbable, osteoconductive systems, to third‐generation bioactivity‐enhanced doped and composite formulations, and finally to fourth‐generation cements incorporating hierarchical macro‐ and nanoscale architectures. This latest generation integrates nanomaterials and engineered pore structures to regulate cell–matrix interactions, mechanotransduction, and tissue regeneration. Across each generation, we critically examine the interdependence of biological, mechanical, and rheological properties, highlighting how architectural and mechanical cues modulate cellular responses. By synthesising advances in materials science and mechanobiology, this review outlines emerging strategies for the design of regenerative, mechanobiologically informed IBCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced NanoBiomed Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202500311
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injectable Bone Cements: A Generational Framework for Bioactivity, Porosity, and Mechanobiological Design at the Nanoscale

Young Jung No, Frank Fei, Yogambha Ramaswamy
Advanced NanoBiomed Research
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Injectable Bone Cements: A Generational Framework for Bioactivity, Porosity, and Mechanobiological Design at the Nanoscale

Young Jung No, Frank Fei, Yogambha Ramaswamy
article en

Abstract

Injectable bone cements (IBCs) are widely used in orthopaedic and craniofacial applications due to their minimally invasive delivery and ability to provide early mechanical stabilisation. Despite substantial progress, clinical translation remains limited by persistent challenges, including insufficient bioactivity, poor control of porosity and interconnectivity, and the limited integration of mechanobiological design principles. Additional constraints arise from the need to balance injectability, setting behaviour, and mechanical performance. Most existing reviews categorise IBCs by material composition, often overlooking important conceptual advances in functionality. Here, we propose a generation‐based classification framework that captures successive shifts in injectable cement design, from first‐generation bioinert structural fillers to second‐generation resorbable, osteoconductive systems, to third‐generation bioactivity‐enhanced doped and composite formulations, and finally to fourth‐generation cements incorporating hierarchical macro‐ and nanoscale architectures. This latest generation integrates nanomaterials and engineered pore structures to regulate cell–matrix interactions, mechanotransduction, and tissue regeneration. Across each generation, we critically examine the interdependence of biological, mechanical, and rheological properties, highlighting how architectural and mechanical cues modulate cellular responses. By synthesising advances in materials science and mechanobiology, this review outlines emerging strategies for the design of regenerative, mechanobiologically informed IBCs.

Advanced NanoBiomed Research
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.