The Anesthesia Preparedeness Clinic (APC) triage score tool: an integrated electronic health record tool for improving resource allocation for preoperative care clinics

Pre-anesthesia clinics have been associated with improved patient outcomes, but with the rising surgical volume, there is a need to improve allocation of preoperative evaluations. We developed the Anesthesia Preparedeness Clinic (APC) Triage Score tool that was integrated into the electronic health record system and calculated a score based on preoperative factors. It was used to allocate preoperative evaluations for patients to either in-person, telehealth, or nursing phone screens. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed compare how resources were allocated prior to and after implementation (Pre-APC and Post-APC, respectively). There were a total of 9,986 and 10,487 surgical patients included in the analysis in the Pre-APC and Post-APC cohorts, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the triage score and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) score based on Spearmen test was 0.59 (P < 0.001). The median (quartiles) APC Triage Score in patients who were ASA PS 1 was 0 (0, 1.5), ASA PS 2 was 3.0 (1.0, 6.0), ASA PS 3 was 9.5 (4.5, 17.0) and ASA PS 4 was 21.0 (11.5, 29.5). Patients that received an in-person visit tended to have higher APC Triage Scores in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohort with a median (quartiles) score of 17.0 (12.0, 25.5) versus 10.0 (6.0, 19.5), respectively (P < 0.001). Patients that received a telehealth visit tended to have higher APC Triage Scores in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohort with a median (quartiles) score of 8.0 (5.0, 13.5) versus 7.0 (3.5, 13.0), respectively (P < 0.001). Finally, patients that received a phone visit tended to have a lower APC Triage Score in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohorts with a median (quartiles) score of 3.0 (1.0, 7.0) versus 4.0 (1.0, 8.5), respectively (P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that implementation of the tool was associated with improved preoperative allocations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01438-8
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Anesthesia Preparedeness Clinic (APC) triage score tool: an integrated electronic health record tool for improving resource allocation for preoperative care clinics

Alice Chien, Minhthy N. Meineke, Rodney A. Gabriel, Elizabeth Kim et al.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

The Anesthesia Preparedeness Clinic (APC) triage score tool: an integrated electronic health record tool for improving resource allocation for preoperative care clinics

Alice Chien, Minhthy N. Meineke, Rodney A. Gabriel, Elizabeth Kim, Brian H. Park, Sophie W. Mawdsley, Megan Meyer
article en

Abstract

Pre-anesthesia clinics have been associated with improved patient outcomes, but with the rising surgical volume, there is a need to improve allocation of preoperative evaluations. We developed the Anesthesia Preparedeness Clinic (APC) Triage Score tool that was integrated into the electronic health record system and calculated a score based on preoperative factors. It was used to allocate preoperative evaluations for patients to either in-person, telehealth, or nursing phone screens. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed compare how resources were allocated prior to and after implementation (Pre-APC and Post-APC, respectively). There were a total of 9,986 and 10,487 surgical patients included in the analysis in the Pre-APC and Post-APC cohorts, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the triage score and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) score based on Spearmen test was 0.59 (P < 0.001). The median (quartiles) APC Triage Score in patients who were ASA PS 1 was 0 (0, 1.5), ASA PS 2 was 3.0 (1.0, 6.0), ASA PS 3 was 9.5 (4.5, 17.0) and ASA PS 4 was 21.0 (11.5, 29.5). Patients that received an in-person visit tended to have higher APC Triage Scores in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohort with a median (quartiles) score of 17.0 (12.0, 25.5) versus 10.0 (6.0, 19.5), respectively (P < 0.001). Patients that received a telehealth visit tended to have higher APC Triage Scores in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohort with a median (quartiles) score of 8.0 (5.0, 13.5) versus 7.0 (3.5, 13.0), respectively (P < 0.001). Finally, patients that received a phone visit tended to have a lower APC Triage Score in the Post-APC versus Pre-APC cohorts with a median (quartiles) score of 3.0 (1.0, 7.0) versus 4.0 (1.0, 8.5), respectively (P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that implementation of the tool was associated with improved preoperative allocations.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
UC San Diego Health System (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.