Evaluating chaplaincy utilization in a suicide-risk-stratified Veterans Affairs patient sample

Although chaplaincy is a key part of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) healthcare services, few studies have investigated how classified suicide risk impacts this service utilization. Filling this gap, this study evaluates utilization patterns in a suicide-risk-stratified national sample of VA patients who died by suicide (cases), as well as suicide risk-matched patients (controls) who did not die by suicide in 2017-2018. Given overdispersion and data sparsity, the study used Bayesian Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial regression and evaluated group and risk-tier status associations. Chaplaincy utilization proportionally declined along with suicide risk; high-risk patients received significantly more care than moderate-risk patients, while moderate-risk patients received significantly more care than low-risk patients. Case and control differences were not significant. Findings support broader pattern of higher-risk patients receiving more care in general. Future investigations that include unstructured data could help contextualize case and control differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2026.2657187
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating chaplaincy utilization in a suicide-risk-stratified Veterans Affairs patient sample

Brian Shiner, Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Evaluating chaplaincy utilization in a suicide-risk-stratified Veterans Affairs patient sample

Brian Shiner, Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy
article en

Abstract

Although chaplaincy is a key part of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) healthcare services, few studies have investigated how classified suicide risk impacts this service utilization. Filling this gap, this study evaluates utilization patterns in a suicide-risk-stratified national sample of VA patients who died by suicide (cases), as well as suicide risk-matched patients (controls) who did not die by suicide in 2017-2018. Given overdispersion and data sparsity, the study used Bayesian Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial regression and evaluated group and risk-tier status associations. Chaplaincy utilization proportionally declined along with suicide risk; high-risk patients received significantly more care than moderate-risk patients, while moderate-risk patients received significantly more care than low-risk patients. Case and control differences were not significant. Findings support broader pattern of higher-risk patients receiving more care in general. Future investigations that include unstructured data could help contextualize case and control differences.

Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Dartmouth College (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), White River Junction VA Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.