Examining the Readability of Cochlear Implant Education Materials

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the readability of both printed and online cochlear implant (CI) education materials across the three Food and Drug Administration–approved CI manufacturers. Method: Educational materials for potential CI recipients were obtained from all three CI manufacturers currently available in the United States: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and MED-EL. These CI materials were transcribed by the authors from physical and electronic PDF materials into a Microsoft Word document. The data were then analyzed using Readability Studio, a quantitative linguistics software application programmed to read text and assign grade-level readability scores to the text. Data were analyzed against four readability measures, commonly used in health literacy literature. Results: Analysis revealed that the majority of the educational materials, both printed and online, were above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. In fact, many of these materials were written at a grade level twice as high as what most people can easily understand. Conclusions: Variability in word complexity, specialized vocabulary, and dense content can make health decisions difficult for many individuals. The study highlights the need to revise educational materials to improve readability while retaining essential information. Future research may explore alternative formats and assess additional resources to enhance comprehension and support for implant candidates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_persp-25-00194
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Readability of Cochlear Implant Education Materials

Hasan K. Saleh, Kimberly W. Ward, Zachary W. Taylor, Katie R. McRaney
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Examining the Readability of Cochlear Implant Education Materials

Hasan K. Saleh, Kimberly W. Ward, Zachary W. Taylor, Katie R. McRaney
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the readability of both printed and online cochlear implant (CI) education materials across the three Food and Drug Administration–approved CI manufacturers. Method: Educational materials for potential CI recipients were obtained from all three CI manufacturers currently available in the United States: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and MED-EL. These CI materials were transcribed by the authors from physical and electronic PDF materials into a Microsoft Word document. The data were then analyzed using Readability Studio, a quantitative linguistics software application programmed to read text and assign grade-level readability scores to the text. Data were analyzed against four readability measures, commonly used in health literacy literature. Results: Analysis revealed that the majority of the educational materials, both printed and online, were above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. In fact, many of these materials were written at a grade level twice as high as what most people can easily understand. Conclusions: Variability in word complexity, specialized vocabulary, and dense content can make health decisions difficult for many individuals. The study highlights the need to revise educational materials to improve readability while retaining essential information. Future research may explore alternative formats and assess additional resources to enhance comprehension and support for implant candidates.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.