Fixing teachers’ problems? exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies

The promise that AI tools will relieve teachers of tedious tasks and liberate time for more ‘valuable’ work with students has become a dominant narrative. However, the implementation of automated technologies raises questions around how human labour is implicated and situated in these processes. From the perspective of maintenance and repair studies we approach the often-hidden labour that teachers undertake when engaging with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies. Drawing on interviews with Swedish teachers we expose the tools’ inherent limitations in teaching contexts, and highlight the pedagogical, social, and moral dimensions of educational practice. We argue that these essentially inexplicable and ungeneralizable aspects of teaching – grounded in teachers’ situated awareness, professional experience, and tacit knowledge – cannot be codified or reduced to training data. Our results demonstrate the need for a radical rethinking of the forms of AI that education could benefit from – and those it should resist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2026.2657793
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fixing teachers’ problems? exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies

Neil Selwyn, Anders Sonesson, Marita Ljungqvist
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Fixing teachers’ problems? exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies

Neil Selwyn, Anders Sonesson, Marita Ljungqvist
article en

Abstract

The promise that AI tools will relieve teachers of tedious tasks and liberate time for more ‘valuable’ work with students has become a dominant narrative. However, the implementation of automated technologies raises questions around how human labour is implicated and situated in these processes. From the perspective of maintenance and repair studies we approach the often-hidden labour that teachers undertake when engaging with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies. Drawing on interviews with Swedish teachers we expose the tools’ inherent limitations in teaching contexts, and highlight the pedagogical, social, and moral dimensions of educational practice. We argue that these essentially inexplicable and ungeneralizable aspects of teaching – grounded in teachers’ situated awareness, professional experience, and tacit knowledge – cannot be codified or reduced to training data. Our results demonstrate the need for a radical rethinking of the forms of AI that education could benefit from – and those it should resist.

Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Lund University (SE), Monash University (AU)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fixing teachers’ problems? exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies — Neil Selwyn, Anders Sonesson, et al. · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS