Benefits and Barriers: CSD Faculty Attitudes Toward Student Accommodations

Purpose: Academic accommodations in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) have been explored via university websites and surveys of clinical educators, but little is known about CSD faculty attitudes toward accommodations in higher education. This study explored the types of accommodations faculty report and the benefits and barriers they encounter in doing so. Method: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study design was used to survey CSD faculty and instructors about the types of accommodations used by CSD students and the benefits and barriers associated with accommodations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants’ responses. Qualitative analyses were used to identify themes on benefits and barriers to academic accommodations. Results: The most common accommodations CSD faculty reported were arranging for a note taker, proctored exams in a supervised setting, and extended time on exams. Regarding barriers, several participants expressed concerns with how students with accommodations in the classroom will adjust as they move into the clinical setting for practica, externships, and future clinical practice. Conclusions: Further research is needed to understand how academic accommodations in CSD can support equal opportunities for students with disabilities, while also ensuring students demonstrate the skills needed for success in clinical practica, externships, and future professional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61403/2689-6443.1408
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits and Barriers: CSD Faculty Attitudes Toward Student Accommodations

Erika Squires, Lori A. Pakulski, Celeste Domsch
Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Benefits and Barriers: CSD Faculty Attitudes Toward Student Accommodations

Erika Squires, Lori A. Pakulski, Celeste Domsch
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Academic accommodations in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) have been explored via university websites and surveys of clinical educators, but little is known about CSD faculty attitudes toward accommodations in higher education. This study explored the types of accommodations faculty report and the benefits and barriers they encounter in doing so. Method: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study design was used to survey CSD faculty and instructors about the types of accommodations used by CSD students and the benefits and barriers associated with accommodations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants’ responses. Qualitative analyses were used to identify themes on benefits and barriers to academic accommodations. Results: The most common accommodations CSD faculty reported were arranging for a note taker, proctored exams in a supervised setting, and extended time on exams. Regarding barriers, several participants expressed concerns with how students with accommodations in the classroom will adjust as they move into the clinical setting for practica, externships, and future clinical practice. Conclusions: Further research is needed to understand how academic accommodations in CSD can support equal opportunities for students with disabilities, while also ensuring students demonstrate the skills needed for success in clinical practica, externships, and future professional practice.

Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & DisordersVol. 10(1)
Wayne State University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.