Firebrands generated from structures in built environment

• Wooden structures were burned in outdoor settings under low outdoor winds (1-2 m/s). • Total firebrand yield (count) from a single structure was quantified for the first time. • Specific firebrand yield (count/kg) was determined for structures for the first time. • Effects of scale, and construction material (e.g., siding and roofing) were evaluated. • Firebrand generation behavior of structures was compared with that of vegetation. Understanding how the characteristics of a structure (e.g., size and materials) influence firebrand production is critical for fire prevention and mitigation in communities. Here, we quantify sensitivities of firebrand generation to structure scale and materials. Twenty-three structures were burned under low outdoor-winds (mean ∼1.0–2.0 m/s). Firebrand number density (count/m²) measured on a gridded field was mapped using interpolation-extrapolation, and integrated to estimate total firebrand yield. Burned mass of structures and burn duration were measured. Three scales (height ∼1.0–3.6 m), three siding-materials, and two roofing-materials were evaluated – total firebrand yields ranged from ∼2,000 to ∼24,000 and burned-mass specific yields (total yield/burned mass) ranged from ∼50 to ∼135 firebrands/kg. Increasing structure scale increased total yield and fuel-load specific yield (firebrand/kg/m 2 ), whereas mass-specific yield (firebrand/kg) showed no clear dependence on scale. In contrast, more combustible materials (e.g., cedar siding) increased the total yield and specific yields (mass and fuel-load based) – further tests are needed to reduce uncertainty. This work provides a dataset of specific firebrand production terms. It is anticipated that these terms can be used to estimate firebrand generation from burning structures, at least for the size and materials evaluated here, if the mass consumed can be determined. These values and the associated uncertainty help to bound potentials for firebrand generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2026.100502
Primary Topic
Fire effects on concrete materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firebrands generated from structures in built environment

David L. Blunck, Jonathan S. Carter, Deepak Sharma, Rohit Kumar Sharma
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Fire effects on concrete materials
article

Firebrands generated from structures in built environment

David L. Blunck, Jonathan S. Carter, Deepak Sharma, Rohit Kumar Sharma
article en

Abstract

• Wooden structures were burned in outdoor settings under low outdoor winds (1-2 m/s). • Total firebrand yield (count) from a single structure was quantified for the first time. • Specific firebrand yield (count/kg) was determined for structures for the first time. • Effects of scale, and construction material (e.g., siding and roofing) were evaluated. • Firebrand generation behavior of structures was compared with that of vegetation. Understanding how the characteristics of a structure (e.g., size and materials) influence firebrand production is critical for fire prevention and mitigation in communities. Here, we quantify sensitivities of firebrand generation to structure scale and materials. Twenty-three structures were burned under low outdoor-winds (mean ∼1.0–2.0 m/s). Firebrand number density (count/m²) measured on a gridded field was mapped using interpolation-extrapolation, and integrated to estimate total firebrand yield. Burned mass of structures and burn duration were measured. Three scales (height ∼1.0–3.6 m), three siding-materials, and two roofing-materials were evaluated – total firebrand yields ranged from ∼2,000 to ∼24,000 and burned-mass specific yields (total yield/burned mass) ranged from ∼50 to ∼135 firebrands/kg. Increasing structure scale increased total yield and fuel-load specific yield (firebrand/kg/m 2 ), whereas mass-specific yield (firebrand/kg) showed no clear dependence on scale. In contrast, more combustible materials (e.g., cedar siding) increased the total yield and specific yields (mass and fuel-load based) – further tests are needed to reduce uncertainty. This work provides a dataset of specific firebrand production terms. It is anticipated that these terms can be used to estimate firebrand generation from burning structures, at least for the size and materials evaluated here, if the mass consumed can be determined. These values and the associated uncertainty help to bound potentials for firebrand generation.

Applications in Energy and Combustion ScienceVol. 26
Oregon State University (US), Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Fire effects on concrete materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.