A comparison of dental professionals’ and patients’ perceptions in assessing smile esthetics

Smile aesthetics is one of the primary reasons for patients to seek aesthetic dental treatment. Although various parameters have been proposed to evaluate smile aesthetics, objective and standardised criteria are still under discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the perception of aesthetic changes differs between dental professionals and laypersons. Frontal photographs of 18 patients were selected from 81 patient photographs. Two full smile images of 18 cases were shown to 86 professionals and 86 layperson participants. Participants were asked to mark the most aesthetic smile and the most important criteria in making their decisions on the prepared forms. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for two-group comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis H test for comparisons with three or more groups. The rate of choosing the aesthetic smile according to the SI was significantly higher in professionals (p < 0.05). In the non-professional group, teeth rate was significantly more often considered the main criterion for aesthetic smile discrimination (p < 0.05). The professional group placed greater emphasis on gingival appearance when evaluating smile aesthetics (p < 0.05). Aesthetic perception differed between professionals and laypersons. The Smile Index should be interpreted alongside other esthetic parameters and patient expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48105-1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of dental professionals’ and patients’ perceptions in assessing smile esthetics

Fatma KARACAOĞLU, Rabia Karaaslan, Gözde Çobanoğlu, Ekin Dikici et al.
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

A comparison of dental professionals’ and patients’ perceptions in assessing smile esthetics

Fatma KARACAOĞLU, Rabia Karaaslan, Gözde Çobanoğlu, Ekin Dikici, Zülal Deniz Güner, Nilsun Bağış
article en

Abstract

Smile aesthetics is one of the primary reasons for patients to seek aesthetic dental treatment. Although various parameters have been proposed to evaluate smile aesthetics, objective and standardised criteria are still under discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the perception of aesthetic changes differs between dental professionals and laypersons. Frontal photographs of 18 patients were selected from 81 patient photographs. Two full smile images of 18 cases were shown to 86 professionals and 86 layperson participants. Participants were asked to mark the most aesthetic smile and the most important criteria in making their decisions on the prepared forms. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for two-group comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis H test for comparisons with three or more groups. The rate of choosing the aesthetic smile according to the SI was significantly higher in professionals (p < 0.05). In the non-professional group, teeth rate was significantly more often considered the main criterion for aesthetic smile discrimination (p < 0.05). The professional group placed greater emphasis on gingival appearance when evaluating smile aesthetics (p < 0.05). Aesthetic perception differed between professionals and laypersons. The Smile Index should be interpreted alongside other esthetic parameters and patient expectations.

Scientific Reports
Çankaya University (TR), Ankara University (TR), Mevlana University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.