Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)
Rationale Chronic cough is a common and burdensome condition with limited licensed therapies. Current guidelines recommend identifying treatable traits and using off-label therapies based largely on small clinical trials, but the real-world effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapies on objective and patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic cough attending a tertiary cough clinic. Methods PROCOUGH was a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study conducted at McMaster University Medical Centre (December 2021–May 2025). Adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks) underwent comprehensive assessment, including lung function testing, airway inflammation measures, sputum cytology, and 24-hour cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™), alongside patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated according to ERS guideline recommendations, with all assessments repeated after a treatment trial. The primary outcome was change in 24-hour cough frequency. Secondary outcomes included Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and Cough Severity VAS (CS-VAS). Responder analyses were based on ≥30% cough frequency reduction, ≥30 mm CS-VAS improvement, and ≥1.3-point LCQ increase. Results One hundred patients completed follow-up (mean age 58.1±14.0 years; 58% female; median cough duration 7 years). Treatment resulted in a 54% reduction in 24-hour cough frequency (95% CI 42.0–62.9%), a 20.2-mm decrease in CS-VAS (95% CI −26.2 to −14.2), and a 3.4-point increase in LCQ (95% CI 2.6–4.2). Individually, 56%, 36%, and 64% met cough frequency, CS-VAS, and LCQ responder criteria, respectively, but only 14% met all three. Despite treatment, 71% reported insufficient cough control. Conclusion Guideline-based therapy improves objective and subjective cough outcomes; however, most patients fail to achieve satisfactory symptom control, highlighting a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for refractory unexplained chronic cough.
Authors
- Jennifer Wattie
- Roma Sehmi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-6304)
- Gail M. Gauvreau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-2385)
- Sue Beaudin
- Paul M. O’Byrne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-281X)
- Karen Howie
- Catie Stevens
- Elena Kum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6548-2632)
- Lesley Wiltshire
- Imran Satia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-6000)
- Kimberley Holt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-8085)
- Wafa Hassan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1461-4367)
- Danica Brister (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9497-2104)
- Nermin Diab (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-6092)
- Mustafaa Wahab
- Kieran J. Killian
- Gordon Guyatt
- Ana Claudia de Souza Pinto Oliveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-6904)
- Jaclyn A Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-4928)
Institutions
- University of Calgary (CA)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Aveiro (PT)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ERJ Open Research
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00279-2026
- Primary Topic
- Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Merck Canada