Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)

Rationale Chronic cough is a common and burdensome condition with limited licensed therapies. Current guidelines recommend identifying treatable traits and using off-label therapies based largely on small clinical trials, but the real-world effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapies on objective and patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic cough attending a tertiary cough clinic. Methods PROCOUGH was a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study conducted at McMaster University Medical Centre (December 2021–May 2025). Adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks) underwent comprehensive assessment, including lung function testing, airway inflammation measures, sputum cytology, and 24-hour cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™), alongside patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated according to ERS guideline recommendations, with all assessments repeated after a treatment trial. The primary outcome was change in 24-hour cough frequency. Secondary outcomes included Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and Cough Severity VAS (CS-VAS). Responder analyses were based on ≥30% cough frequency reduction, ≥30 mm CS-VAS improvement, and ≥1.3-point LCQ increase. Results One hundred patients completed follow-up (mean age 58.1±14.0 years; 58% female; median cough duration 7 years). Treatment resulted in a 54% reduction in 24-hour cough frequency (95% CI 42.0–62.9%), a 20.2-mm decrease in CS-VAS (95% CI −26.2 to −14.2), and a 3.4-point increase in LCQ (95% CI 2.6–4.2). Individually, 56%, 36%, and 64% met cough frequency, CS-VAS, and LCQ responder criteria, respectively, but only 14% met all three. Despite treatment, 71% reported insufficient cough control. Conclusion Guideline-based therapy improves objective and subjective cough outcomes; however, most patients fail to achieve satisfactory symptom control, highlighting a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for refractory unexplained chronic cough.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00279-2026
Primary Topic
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)

Jennifer Wattie, Roma Sehmi, Gail M. Gauvreau, Sue Beaudin et al.
ERJ Open Research
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
article

Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)

Jennifer Wattie, Roma Sehmi, Gail M. Gauvreau, Sue Beaudin, Paul M. O’Byrne, Karen Howie, Catie Stevens, Elena Kum, Lesley Wiltshire, Imran Satia, Kimberley Holt, Wafa Hassan, Danica Brister, Nermin Diab, Mustafaa Wahab, Kieran J. Killian, Gordon Guyatt, Ana Claudia de Souza Pinto Oliveira, Jaclyn A Smith
article en

Abstract

Rationale Chronic cough is a common and burdensome condition with limited licensed therapies. Current guidelines recommend identifying treatable traits and using off-label therapies based largely on small clinical trials, but the real-world effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapies on objective and patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic cough attending a tertiary cough clinic. Methods PROCOUGH was a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study conducted at McMaster University Medical Centre (December 2021–May 2025). Adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks) underwent comprehensive assessment, including lung function testing, airway inflammation measures, sputum cytology, and 24-hour cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™), alongside patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated according to ERS guideline recommendations, with all assessments repeated after a treatment trial. The primary outcome was change in 24-hour cough frequency. Secondary outcomes included Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and Cough Severity VAS (CS-VAS). Responder analyses were based on ≥30% cough frequency reduction, ≥30 mm CS-VAS improvement, and ≥1.3-point LCQ increase. Results One hundred patients completed follow-up (mean age 58.1±14.0 years; 58% female; median cough duration 7 years). Treatment resulted in a 54% reduction in 24-hour cough frequency (95% CI 42.0–62.9%), a 20.2-mm decrease in CS-VAS (95% CI −26.2 to −14.2), and a 3.4-point increase in LCQ (95% CI 2.6–4.2). Individually, 56%, 36%, and 64% met cough frequency, CS-VAS, and LCQ responder criteria, respectively, but only 14% met all three. Despite treatment, 71% reported insufficient cough control. Conclusion Guideline-based therapy improves objective and subjective cough outcomes; however, most patients fail to achieve satisfactory symptom control, highlighting a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for refractory unexplained chronic cough.

ERJ Open Research
University of Calgary (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Aveiro (PT), McMaster University (CA)
Merck Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.