The Injustice of Bathroom Bills

Abstract Bathroom bills are laws or policies that require trans people to use bathrooms for the gender they were assigned at birth rather than the gender that matches their gender identity. Florida, Kansas, and Texas currently have bathroom bills in place, the UK in all likelihood will soon have such a bill in place. And many other US states have limited bathroom bills in place. Existing philosophical work on bathroom bills by gender-critical feminists Lawford-Smith and Stock has argued that bathroom bills are just or right. This paper argues that bathroom bills breach trans people’s rights, and these rights are not outweighed by other rights or other considerations, so bathroom bills are unjust. First, it argues that bathroom bills violate trans people’s rights to public, civic, or social participation without harm. It then argues that even idealized bathroom bills, very different from those that have been proposed, enacted, and argued for, that require all public spaces to have a plentiful supply of gender-neutral bathrooms designed for trans people to use, would breach trans people’s rights against unjust statistical discrimination. Finally, the paper addresses Lawford-Smith’s and Stock’s arguments in detail. It establishes that these arguments fail to show that bathroom bills are just.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hypatia
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2025.10057
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Injustice of Bathroom Bills

Richard Rowland
Hypatia
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The Injustice of Bathroom Bills

Richard Rowland
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bathroom bills are laws or policies that require trans people to use bathrooms for the gender they were assigned at birth rather than the gender that matches their gender identity. Florida, Kansas, and Texas currently have bathroom bills in place, the UK in all likelihood will soon have such a bill in place. And many other US states have limited bathroom bills in place. Existing philosophical work on bathroom bills by gender-critical feminists Lawford-Smith and Stock has argued that bathroom bills are just or right. This paper argues that bathroom bills breach trans people’s rights, and these rights are not outweighed by other rights or other considerations, so bathroom bills are unjust. First, it argues that bathroom bills violate trans people’s rights to public, civic, or social participation without harm. It then argues that even idealized bathroom bills, very different from those that have been proposed, enacted, and argued for, that require all public spaces to have a plentiful supply of gender-neutral bathrooms designed for trans people to use, would breach trans people’s rights against unjust statistical discrimination. Finally, the paper addresses Lawford-Smith’s and Stock’s arguments in detail. It establishes that these arguments fail to show that bathroom bills are just.

Hypatia
University of Leeds (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.