The Predictive Effects of Perceptions of AI‐generated Feedback on Feedback‐Seeking Behavior: A Prospective Study Testing the Cost‐value Framework

ABSTRACT The concept of feedback‐seeking behavior provides a novel perspective for understanding learners’ proactive roles in feedback processes. Although AI‐generated feedback has been promoted as a supplement to teacher feedback, limited evidence exists regarding language learners’ AI feedback‐seeking behavior or its proximal antecedents, particularly in skills beyond writing. Drawing on a cost‐value framework and employing a prospective design, this study investigates the predictive effects of language learners’ perceptions of AI‐generated feedback on their use of feedback‐seeking strategies in subsequent translation tasks. Questionnaire data collected from 344 undergraduates enrolled in a translation course were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results showed that the perceived values of AI feedback significantly predicted the frequency of feedback‐seeking strategies, whereas perceived costs did not. The effect of the utility value of AI feedback on feedback‐seeking strategies was greater than that of the intrinsic value of AI feedback. These distinct motivational patterns of AI feedback‐seeking behavior suggest that the cost‐value framework should be further refined to better suit AI‐mediated contexts and enhance its explanatory power. This study has important implications for research on learners’ AI feedback‐seeking behavior and for integrating AI feedback into language instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70195
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Predictive Effects of Perceptions of AI‐generated Feedback on Feedback‐Seeking Behavior: A Prospective Study Testing the Cost‐value Framework

Deliang Man, Beibei Kong, Li Zhang
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

The Predictive Effects of Perceptions of AI‐generated Feedback on Feedback‐Seeking Behavior: A Prospective Study Testing the Cost‐value Framework

Deliang Man, Beibei Kong, Li Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of feedback‐seeking behavior provides a novel perspective for understanding learners’ proactive roles in feedback processes. Although AI‐generated feedback has been promoted as a supplement to teacher feedback, limited evidence exists regarding language learners’ AI feedback‐seeking behavior or its proximal antecedents, particularly in skills beyond writing. Drawing on a cost‐value framework and employing a prospective design, this study investigates the predictive effects of language learners’ perceptions of AI‐generated feedback on their use of feedback‐seeking strategies in subsequent translation tasks. Questionnaire data collected from 344 undergraduates enrolled in a translation course were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results showed that the perceived values of AI feedback significantly predicted the frequency of feedback‐seeking strategies, whereas perceived costs did not. The effect of the utility value of AI feedback on feedback‐seeking strategies was greater than that of the intrinsic value of AI feedback. These distinct motivational patterns of AI feedback‐seeking behavior suggest that the cost‐value framework should be further refined to better suit AI‐mediated contexts and enhance its explanatory power. This study has important implications for research on learners’ AI feedback‐seeking behavior and for integrating AI feedback into language instruction.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN)
Guangdong Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.