Gesell: The Revolution Still Waiting to Happen Taking Stock of an Anarchistic Dream After 30 Years of Militancy

ABSTRACT This paper reassesses the legacy of Silvio Gesell and the fate of the anarchistic monetary reform tradition inspired by Pierre‐Joseph Proudhon. It argues that Gesell's proposal of “perishable money” (demurrage) provides the missing theoretical key to the long‐standing problem of interest and rent, reframing them as institutional mechanisms of systemic rent extraction. The article reconstructs the intellectual genealogy leading from the Proudhon–Bastiat debate to Gesell's synthesis, and examines how Marxism, marginalism, Keynesianism, and libertarianism successively marginalized or neutralized this tradition. It contends that modern economics has obscured the political nature of money and the role of banking in sustaining oligarchic structures of power. The paper also reflects on the author's three decades of advocacy for Gesellian reform and the persistent institutional resistance encountered. Despite renewed interest in negative rates, complementary currencies, and cryptocurrencies, the essay concludes that the radical institutional implications of Gesell's project remain largely unacknowledged, leaving his “revolution” still waiting to happen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.70042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
45.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gesell: The Revolution Still Waiting to Happen Taking Stock of an Anarchistic Dream After 30 Years of Militancy

Guido Giacomo Preparata
1 citations
American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Political Economy and Marxism
45.70
article

Gesell: The Revolution Still Waiting to Happen Taking Stock of an Anarchistic Dream After 30 Years of Militancy

Guido Giacomo Preparata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reassesses the legacy of Silvio Gesell and the fate of the anarchistic monetary reform tradition inspired by Pierre‐Joseph Proudhon. It argues that Gesell's proposal of “perishable money” (demurrage) provides the missing theoretical key to the long‐standing problem of interest and rent, reframing them as institutional mechanisms of systemic rent extraction. The article reconstructs the intellectual genealogy leading from the Proudhon–Bastiat debate to Gesell's synthesis, and examines how Marxism, marginalism, Keynesianism, and libertarianism successively marginalized or neutralized this tradition. It contends that modern economics has obscured the political nature of money and the role of banking in sustaining oligarchic structures of power. The paper also reflects on the author's three decades of advocacy for Gesellian reform and the persistent institutional resistance encountered. Despite renewed interest in negative rates, complementary currencies, and cryptocurrencies, the essay concludes that the radical institutional implications of Gesell's project remain largely unacknowledged, leaving his “revolution” still waiting to happen.

American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Città di Castello Hospital (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Political Economy and Marxism
45.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.