Wide versus limited cochlear duct exposure: impact on intraoperative cochlear implant measurements

Abstract Background To study the difference in intraoperative Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) and electrode impedance measurements between wide versus limited exposure of the cochlear duct (CD) during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods A retrospective observational study included all patients operated on with CI at a tertiary center who met the inclusion criteria: normal anatomy, receipt of the same electrode array, use of the same round window surgical technique, and either wide or limited CD exposure. Cases with inner ear anomalies, hypoplastic cochlear nerve, auditory neuropathy, and cochleostomy were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (wide CD exposure) and Group B (limited CD exposure). Demographic data of both groups were collected. Intraoperative ECAP and electrode impedance were recorded, verified, and analyzed using R Language. Results The study included 153 cases, with an average age of 7.7 ± 9.5 years; males represented 53.6%. About 91.5% of implanted ears were right-sided. The intraoperative ECAP analysis for 12 electrodes showed no significant differences: wide CD exposure averages ranged from 18.0 ± 6.9 to 18.9 ± 6.8, compared with limited CD exposure averages ranging from 17.9 ± 5.3 to 17.5 ± 6.7 ( p > 0.05). Impedance measures also showed no significant differences: wide CD exposure averages were 7.8 ± 3.0 to 4.7 ± 1.9 kΩ compared to limited exposure from 8.1 ± 2.9 to 5.5 ± 3.7 kΩ ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The results show that both wide- and limited-cochlear-duct surgical methods resulted in comparable intraoperative ECAP and impedance measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-026-01078-4
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wide versus limited cochlear duct exposure: impact on intraoperative cochlear implant measurements

Mohammad Mostafa Gaballah, Moataz Abdel Baky, Ihab Kamel Sefein, Ahmed Mustafa
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Wide versus limited cochlear duct exposure: impact on intraoperative cochlear implant measurements

Mohammad Mostafa Gaballah, Moataz Abdel Baky, Ihab Kamel Sefein, Ahmed Mustafa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To study the difference in intraoperative Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) and electrode impedance measurements between wide versus limited exposure of the cochlear duct (CD) during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods A retrospective observational study included all patients operated on with CI at a tertiary center who met the inclusion criteria: normal anatomy, receipt of the same electrode array, use of the same round window surgical technique, and either wide or limited CD exposure. Cases with inner ear anomalies, hypoplastic cochlear nerve, auditory neuropathy, and cochleostomy were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (wide CD exposure) and Group B (limited CD exposure). Demographic data of both groups were collected. Intraoperative ECAP and electrode impedance were recorded, verified, and analyzed using R Language. Results The study included 153 cases, with an average age of 7.7 ± 9.5 years; males represented 53.6%. About 91.5% of implanted ears were right-sided. The intraoperative ECAP analysis for 12 electrodes showed no significant differences: wide CD exposure averages ranged from 18.0 ± 6.9 to 18.9 ± 6.8, compared with limited CD exposure averages ranging from 17.9 ± 5.3 to 17.5 ± 6.7 ( p > 0.05). Impedance measures also showed no significant differences: wide CD exposure averages were 7.8 ± 3.0 to 4.7 ± 1.9 kΩ compared to limited exposure from 8.1 ± 2.9 to 5.5 ± 3.7 kΩ ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The results show that both wide- and limited-cochlear-duct surgical methods resulted in comparable intraoperative ECAP and impedance measurements.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 42(1)
General Organization For Teaching Hospitals and Institutes (EG), National Water Research Center (EG), Ministry of Health and Population (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wide versus limited cochlear duct exposure: impact on intraoperative cochlear implant measurements — Mohammad Mostafa Gaballah, Moataz Abdel Baky, et al. · The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS