Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Effects on Picture Description: A Main Concept Analysis in Korean and English Speakers With and Without Aphasia

PURPOSE: This study examined cross-linguistic and cross-cultural influences on picture-based narrative performance in Korean and English speakers with and without aphasia. We evaluated whether pro-drop-adjusted main concept (MC) scoring accounts for linguistic effects, identified picture-driven cultural effects on discourse, and examined associations between aphasia severity and performance. METHOD: -from 54 neurotypical adults (27 Korean neurotypical adults [K-NA], 27 English neurotypical adults [E-NA]) and 34 persons with aphasia (17 Korean persons with aphasia [K-PWA], 17 English persons with aphasia [E-PWA]). In addition to the original MC scoring criteria, we adapted the framework by developing a pro-drop adjustment that credited omitted but contextually recoverable arguments. Language and picture effects were examined under both MC criteria, whereas clinical group effects were evaluated using the adjusted criteria. Additional analyses identified MCs distinguishing language groups and examined associations with Aphasia Quotient (AQ). RESULTS: in E-PWA. CONCLUSIONS: , even after linguistic adjustments. Limited familiarity with the scene likely hindered Korean speakers' ability to generate core narrative elements. Both linguistic and cultural factors should be considered when selecting picture stimuli for discourse assessment across diverse contexts. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31974204.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00422
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Effects on Picture Description: A Main Concept Analysis in Korean and English Speakers With and Without Aphasia

Yae Rin Yoo, Jee Eun Sung, Jimin Park
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Effects on Picture Description: A Main Concept Analysis in Korean and English Speakers With and Without Aphasia

Yae Rin Yoo, Jee Eun Sung, Jimin Park
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined cross-linguistic and cross-cultural influences on picture-based narrative performance in Korean and English speakers with and without aphasia. We evaluated whether pro-drop-adjusted main concept (MC) scoring accounts for linguistic effects, identified picture-driven cultural effects on discourse, and examined associations between aphasia severity and performance. METHOD: -from 54 neurotypical adults (27 Korean neurotypical adults [K-NA], 27 English neurotypical adults [E-NA]) and 34 persons with aphasia (17 Korean persons with aphasia [K-PWA], 17 English persons with aphasia [E-PWA]). In addition to the original MC scoring criteria, we adapted the framework by developing a pro-drop adjustment that credited omitted but contextually recoverable arguments. Language and picture effects were examined under both MC criteria, whereas clinical group effects were evaluated using the adjusted criteria. Additional analyses identified MCs distinguishing language groups and examined associations with Aphasia Quotient (AQ). RESULTS: in E-PWA. CONCLUSIONS: , even after linguistic adjustments. Limited familiarity with the scene likely hindered Korean speakers' ability to generate core narrative elements. Both linguistic and cultural factors should be considered when selecting picture stimuli for discourse assessment across diverse contexts. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31974204.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.