Evaluating Metrics Assessing Surgical Success in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Importance: As health insurers, payers, and policymakers look to Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) measures to judge eye care quality, compare surgeon performance, and make decisions about reimbursement, it is essential to understand the validity and generalizability of these metrics. Objective: To assess the validity and generalizability of 2024 MIPS measure 191, Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery. Design, Setting, Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent at least 1 cataract surgery from 2010 through 2023 at any of 16 participating health systems in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE). The study assessed whether patient demographic characteristics and nonclinical and clinical factors were associated with achieving success, which MIPS measure 191 defines as a best recorded visual acuity of at least 20/40 within 90 days following cataract surgery. Data analysis was conducted from June 2024 to December 2025. Exposures: Cataract surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of patients undergoing cataract surgery achieving success and the odds of surgical success were determined; for patients with 2 operative eyes, only the first eye surgery was assessed. Success rates were evaluated among all surgery recipients and separately among patients with no preexisting chronic ocular diseases as specified by the metric. Success rates were quantified using more stringent cutoffs and adjusting the follow-up duration. Logistic regression models assessed how nonbiological determinants of health and clinical factors influenced the odds of success. Results: A total of 55 132 patients underwent cataract surgery (mean [SD] age, 70.3 [9.3] years; 32 240 [58.5%] female; 1973 [3.6%] Asian American; 7053 [12.8%] Black; 1993 [3.6%] Hispanic; 42 178 [76.5%] White [race and ethnicity were self-reported]). Among all patients undergoing surgery, 49 979 (90.7%) achieved surgical success. Excluding patients with ocular comorbidities (25 563 patients [46.4%]), 28 242 of 29 569 (95.5%) achieved surgical success. Living in the least (vs most) affluent community (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), undergoing complex surgery (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89) or a combination of cataract with another intraocular surgery (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.29-0.35), and having diabetes (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) were associated with lower odds of surgical success. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most patients undergoing cataract surgery achieved success as defined by MIPS measure 191; however, the existing measure excluded nearly half of patients undergoing surgery, and older patients and Black patients were more likely to be excluded. Case-mix adjustment of patients' sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors may be necessary to ensure fairness when comparing surgeons' performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.0845
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Metrics Assessing Surgical Success in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Tony N. Pira, Sophia Ying Wang, Azraa S. Chaudhury, Louis R. Pasquale et al.
JAMA Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Evaluating Metrics Assessing Surgical Success in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Tony N. Pira, Sophia Ying Wang, Azraa S. Chaudhury, Louis R. Pasquale, Charlesnika Tyon Evans, Merina Thomas, Rithambara Ramachandran, Manju L. Subramanian, Michelle R. Hribar, Adovich S. Rivera, Paul A. Edwards, Brian C. Stagg, Rajeev S. Ramchandran, Brian L. VanderBeek, Sejal Amin, Anurag Shrivastava, Michael Deiner, Arsham Sheybani, Suzann Pershing, Divya S. Srikumaran, Paul J. Bryar, Dustin D. French, Soshian Sarrapour, Shikha Marwah, Jeffrey S. Schultz, Saleha Munir, Brian McMillian, Prem Subramanian, Lindsey DeLott, Kristen Harris-Nwanyanwu, Baseer Ahmad, Preethi Ganapathy, Barbara Wirostko, Chris A. Andrews, Arjun Dirghangi, Sandeepkumar Gaddam, Joshua D. Stein, Ore-ofe Adesina, Alon Harris, Fasika Woreta, Vaidehi Dedania, Victoria Tseng, Xueqing Zhou, Wuqaas Munir, Yang Li, Anne E. Coleman, Jennifer Patnaik, Chris Andrews, Catherine Sun
article en

Abstract

Importance: As health insurers, payers, and policymakers look to Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) measures to judge eye care quality, compare surgeon performance, and make decisions about reimbursement, it is essential to understand the validity and generalizability of these metrics. Objective: To assess the validity and generalizability of 2024 MIPS measure 191, Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery. Design, Setting, Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent at least 1 cataract surgery from 2010 through 2023 at any of 16 participating health systems in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE). The study assessed whether patient demographic characteristics and nonclinical and clinical factors were associated with achieving success, which MIPS measure 191 defines as a best recorded visual acuity of at least 20/40 within 90 days following cataract surgery. Data analysis was conducted from June 2024 to December 2025. Exposures: Cataract surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of patients undergoing cataract surgery achieving success and the odds of surgical success were determined; for patients with 2 operative eyes, only the first eye surgery was assessed. Success rates were evaluated among all surgery recipients and separately among patients with no preexisting chronic ocular diseases as specified by the metric. Success rates were quantified using more stringent cutoffs and adjusting the follow-up duration. Logistic regression models assessed how nonbiological determinants of health and clinical factors influenced the odds of success. Results: A total of 55 132 patients underwent cataract surgery (mean [SD] age, 70.3 [9.3] years; 32 240 [58.5%] female; 1973 [3.6%] Asian American; 7053 [12.8%] Black; 1993 [3.6%] Hispanic; 42 178 [76.5%] White [race and ethnicity were self-reported]). Among all patients undergoing surgery, 49 979 (90.7%) achieved surgical success. Excluding patients with ocular comorbidities (25 563 patients [46.4%]), 28 242 of 29 569 (95.5%) achieved surgical success. Living in the least (vs most) affluent community (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), undergoing complex surgery (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89) or a combination of cataract with another intraocular surgery (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.29-0.35), and having diabetes (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) were associated with lower odds of surgical success. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most patients undergoing cataract surgery achieved success as defined by MIPS measure 191; however, the existing measure excluded nearly half of patients undergoing surgery, and older patients and Black patients were more likely to be excluded. Case-mix adjustment of patients' sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors may be necessary to ensure fairness when comparing surgeons' performance.

JAMA Ophthalmology
Northwestern University (US), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.