Tree diversity and land use choices in agroforestry systems: co-learning through the FORCES game in Indonesia
Farmers make choices about their land-use portfolio based on their experience, incomplete information and social connections. Rather than imposing normative economic or ecological rationales for farmer choices, a participatory simulation game can lead to co-learning. We utilized a plot-level game, Farmer Options, Risks in Complex Ecological-Social system (FORCES), to explore the management of tree and crop diversity in three contrasting landscapes in Indonesia. We assessed farmer management choices, responses to socio-ecological pressures and quantified game impacts on changes in farmer discourse. We found gendered preferences for plant species and land-use practices. Most older farmers preferred tree-based system, while young farmers chose annual food crops, opting for higher income despite risks. Social, cultural, and ecological reasons played important role in decision-making alongside economic factors but depended on the local context. By clarifying consequences of farmers’ choices, a top-down and bottom-up approach can be reconciled in the search for sustainable landscape management.
Authors
- Arief Lukman Hakim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-9103)
- Lisa Tanika (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5319-7607)
- Erika N. Speelman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-4939)
- Rika Ratna Sari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-9352)
- Meine van Noordwijk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-4703)
- Danaë M. A. Rozendaal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-3222)
- Rizki M. Ishaq
- Danny D. Saputra
Institutions
- University of Brawijaya (ID)
- Center for International Forestry Research (PE)
- World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Land Use Science
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423x.2026.2656154
- Primary Topic
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00