Quality of Life After Radical Cystectomy: Meta-analysis of Neobladder and Ileal Conduit Outcomes Across Multiple Assessment Tools
Background and objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) requires urinary diversion, commonly orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC). While ONB preserves natural voiding, IC is technically simpler. This study aimed to compare long-term (>12 mo) quality of life (QoL) outcomes between ONB and IC to aid preoperative shared decision-making. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to September 15, 2025. We included studies comparing ONB and IC in adults with follow-up >12 mo. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed bias, and Review Manager v5.4 was used for analysis. Key findings and limitations: = 0.02; positive value indicates higher score in IC). Heterogeneity among studies was moderate to high. Meta-regression indicated geographic location and tumor characteristics influenced heterogeneity. Limitations include observational design and potential selection bias. Conclusions and clinical implications: ONB reconstruction is associated with higher overall QoL scores, while IC is associated with higher urinary scores. These findings represent clinical trade-offs rather than superiority. Surgical selection should be individualized, balancing patient preference for body image against the risk of functional management challenge.
Authors
- Rainy Umbas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-226X)
- Fakhri Rahman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-7218)
- Ervita Mediana
- Hassan Abol-Enein
- Chaidir A. Mochtar
- Agus R.A.H. Hamid
Institutions
- Mansoura University (EG)
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Urology Open Science
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.03.005
- Primary Topic
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00