Additional Surgery after Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition: An 8 Year Follow-Up of 1369 Patients

BACKGROUND: Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition (LRTI) is a key treatment for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA). Despite proven effectiveness, concerns remain about the need for revision surgery and its impact on long-term outcomes. Current literature lacks data on long-term rates of additional surgery. Therefore, this study evaluates long-term outcomes of trapeziectomy with LRTI in CMC-1 OA, focusing on revision rate. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included patients who underwent trapeziectomy with LRTI (Weilby-sling, Burton-Pellegrini, or APL-sling) for CMC-1 OA between December 2011 and October 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of additional surgery beyond one year following LRTI, focusing on revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included prognostic factors for revision surgery, and long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Additionally, the impact of revision surgery on PROMS was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1369 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years (range 3.1 to 13.0 years), of which 13% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 11.3% to 14.9%) underwent additional surgery beyond one year. Revision surgery was required in 2.6% (95% CI: 1.7% to 3.5%). The APL-sling technique and younger age were associated with higher revision rates. PROMs improved significantly between 12 months and long-term follow-up, with revision surgery being associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up revealed a 13% additional surgery rate, with 2.6% requiring revision surgery. We suggest that the APL-sling should be approached with caution. In younger patients, alternative treatments should be considered to postpone LRTI surgery and reduce revision risk.Level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013127
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional Surgery after Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition: An 8 Year Follow-Up of 1369 Patients

Caroline A. Hundepool, Xander Smit, Lisa Hoogendam, J. Michiel Zuidam et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Additional Surgery after Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition: An 8 Year Follow-Up of 1369 Patients

Caroline A. Hundepool, Xander Smit, Lisa Hoogendam, J. Michiel Zuidam, Cecile M.C.A. van Laarhoven, Niek J. Nieuwdorp, the Hand-Wrist Study Group, Cathelijne Daams
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition (LRTI) is a key treatment for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA). Despite proven effectiveness, concerns remain about the need for revision surgery and its impact on long-term outcomes. Current literature lacks data on long-term rates of additional surgery. Therefore, this study evaluates long-term outcomes of trapeziectomy with LRTI in CMC-1 OA, focusing on revision rate. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included patients who underwent trapeziectomy with LRTI (Weilby-sling, Burton-Pellegrini, or APL-sling) for CMC-1 OA between December 2011 and October 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of additional surgery beyond one year following LRTI, focusing on revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included prognostic factors for revision surgery, and long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Additionally, the impact of revision surgery on PROMS was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1369 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years (range 3.1 to 13.0 years), of which 13% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 11.3% to 14.9%) underwent additional surgery beyond one year. Revision surgery was required in 2.6% (95% CI: 1.7% to 3.5%). The APL-sling technique and younger age were associated with higher revision rates. PROMs improved significantly between 12 months and long-term follow-up, with revision surgery being associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up revealed a 13% additional surgery rate, with 2.6% requiring revision surgery. We suggest that the APL-sling should be approached with caution. In younger patients, alternative treatments should be considered to postpone LRTI surgery and reduce revision risk.Level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
University of Mary (US), Center for Science in the Public Interest (United States) (US), Harvard University (US), Erasmus MC (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Knowledge Foundation (SE), Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.