Parenting, family interventions and sibling support offered by local authority services for families of children with intellectual disabilities

<ns3:p>Background Families of children with intellectual disabilities often experience increased adversity. Despite this, parent-reported data suggest that these families experience significant barriers in accessing appropriate supports. Less research has characterised what service providers offer to families. Understanding usual support for these families is important when considering comparators in evaluation research. This study aimed to describe support as usual, in terms of parenting, family, and sibling intervention support, for families of children with intellectual disabilities as reported by professionals and service providers to inform the design of future research trialling new parenting and sibling interventions, respectively. Methods Data on supports available to parents, siblings, and young carers, were extracted from the Local Offer websites of 100 randomly selected English Local Authorities. Survey data were also collected from 66 professionals, either working in UK Local Authority services and/or services commissioned by Local Authorities, about what programmes or interventions are currently offered to parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Data were analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results A wide range of support programmes or interventions were described as being available to parents of children with intellectual disabilities, with most primarily designed for parents of non-disabled children or parents of children generally with special educational needs and disabilities. Data extracted from Local Offer websites led to the identification of six broad categories of programmes for parents; relatively few Local Authorities provided supports for siblings or young carers. Conclusion Our findings offer researchers and professionals insights into usual support offered by Local Authorities to families of children with intellectual disabilities. Future research may draw upon these findings when designing evaluations of health and social care interventions in the UK. Additional research is needed to examine the relationship between what might be on offer for families in theory and what they are able to access.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13934.3
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parenting, family interventions and sibling support offered by local authority services for families of children with intellectual disabilities

Daisy Russell, Nicola McMeekin, Richard P. Hastings, Joanna Griffin et al.
NIHR Open Research
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Parenting, family interventions and sibling support offered by local authority services for families of children with intellectual disabilities

Daisy Russell, Nicola McMeekin, Richard P. Hastings, Joanna Griffin, Kylie M. Gray, Amanda Allard, Jeanne Wolstencroft, Clare Kassa, Elizabeth Randell, Daniel Sutherland, Paul Andrew Thompson, Elinor Coulman, Emma L. Taylor, Bronwen Willoughby-Richards, Joanna Carr
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Families of children with intellectual disabilities often experience increased adversity. Despite this, parent-reported data suggest that these families experience significant barriers in accessing appropriate supports. Less research has characterised what service providers offer to families. Understanding usual support for these families is important when considering comparators in evaluation research. This study aimed to describe support as usual, in terms of parenting, family, and sibling intervention support, for families of children with intellectual disabilities as reported by professionals and service providers to inform the design of future research trialling new parenting and sibling interventions, respectively. Methods Data on supports available to parents, siblings, and young carers, were extracted from the Local Offer websites of 100 randomly selected English Local Authorities. Survey data were also collected from 66 professionals, either working in UK Local Authority services and/or services commissioned by Local Authorities, about what programmes or interventions are currently offered to parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Data were analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results A wide range of support programmes or interventions were described as being available to parents of children with intellectual disabilities, with most primarily designed for parents of non-disabled children or parents of children generally with special educational needs and disabilities. Data extracted from Local Offer websites led to the identification of six broad categories of programmes for parents; relatively few Local Authorities provided supports for siblings or young carers. Conclusion Our findings offer researchers and professionals insights into usual support offered by Local Authorities to families of children with intellectual disabilities. Future research may draw upon these findings when designing evaluations of health and social care interventions in the UK. Additional research is needed to examine the relationship between what might be on offer for families in theory and what they are able to access.</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 5
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Scope Group (United States) (US), Children's Council (US), Monash Health (AU), Institute of Child Health (IN), University College London (GB), Monash University (AU), University of Glasgow (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB), University of Wales (GB)
Health Technology Assessment Programme
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.