Independent assessment of the WHO Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases application for leprosy detection

Objectives: To independently evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) application, focusing on the diagnostic performance of its underlying artificial intelligence model for leprosy detection. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of images in which leprosy appeared among the model's Top-5 diagnostic predictions. The secondary objective was to qualitatively analyze diagnostic error patterns. Methods: A data set of 439 anonymized clinical images from confirmed leprosy cases (1996-2024) was analyzed, spanning the full clinical spectrum (indeterminate, tuberculoid, borderline/dimorphous, and lepromatous/Virchowian forms) and including reactional and atypical presentations. After excluding 16 images due to processing errors, 423 images were retained: 367 classical leprosy lesions and 56 reactional or atypical leprosy-related presentations. All images were evaluated using the WHO desktop version of the visual classifier. Top-5 sensitivity (recall) for leprosy was estimated, alongside a qualitative error analysis focusing on intrapatient inconsistencies and challenging lesion types. Results: The model achieved an overall Top-5 sensitivity (recall) of 84.9%, with higher sensitivity for classical lesions (87.2%) than for reactional or atypical presentations (69.6%). Qualitative review revealed inconsistent predictions for visually similar lesions from the same patient, and misclassifications concentrated among necrotic, inflammatory, and infiltrative lesions. Conclusions: The WHO Skin NTDs application demonstrates substantial promise as a clinical decision-support and educational tool, especially for classical leprosy. Performance gaps for reactional and atypical forms highlight the need for algorithmic refinement. Enhancing data set diversity and integrating patient-level context may improve diagnostic robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2026.40
Primary Topic
Leprosy Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Independent assessment of the WHO Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases application for leprosy detection

Rachel Bertolani do Espírito Santo, Bianca Barros Canhamaque Amorim, Marcos César Florian, Rafael Maffei Loureiro et al.
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Leprosy Research and Treatment
article

Independent assessment of the WHO Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases application for leprosy detection

Rachel Bertolani do Espírito Santo, Bianca Barros Canhamaque Amorim, Marcos César Florian, Rafael Maffei Loureiro, Douglas Almonfrey, Nkechi Anne Enechukwu, Mecciene Mendes Rodrigues, José A Ruiz-Postigo, Gleice Nunes Lima, Thiago Zanetti Barreiro, Andrea Maia Fernandes Fonseca, Patrícia Deps, Taynah Repsold
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To independently evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) application, focusing on the diagnostic performance of its underlying artificial intelligence model for leprosy detection. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of images in which leprosy appeared among the model's Top-5 diagnostic predictions. The secondary objective was to qualitatively analyze diagnostic error patterns. Methods: A data set of 439 anonymized clinical images from confirmed leprosy cases (1996-2024) was analyzed, spanning the full clinical spectrum (indeterminate, tuberculoid, borderline/dimorphous, and lepromatous/Virchowian forms) and including reactional and atypical presentations. After excluding 16 images due to processing errors, 423 images were retained: 367 classical leprosy lesions and 56 reactional or atypical leprosy-related presentations. All images were evaluated using the WHO desktop version of the visual classifier. Top-5 sensitivity (recall) for leprosy was estimated, alongside a qualitative error analysis focusing on intrapatient inconsistencies and challenging lesion types. Results: The model achieved an overall Top-5 sensitivity (recall) of 84.9%, with higher sensitivity for classical lesions (87.2%) than for reactional or atypical presentations (69.6%). Qualitative review revealed inconsistent predictions for visually similar lesions from the same patient, and misclassifications concentrated among necrotic, inflammatory, and infiltrative lesions. Conclusions: The WHO Skin NTDs application demonstrates substantial promise as a clinical decision-support and educational tool, especially for classical leprosy. Performance gaps for reactional and atypical forms highlight the need for algorithmic refinement. Enhancing data set diversity and integrating patient-level context may improve diagnostic robustness.

Revista Panamericana de Salud PúblicaVol. 50
Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Patrick Air Force Base (US), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), World Health Organization (CH), Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NG), Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Leprosy Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.