When the future cannot reach everyone: Disability erasure in climate modelling

Climate models play a central role in shaping how societies imagine, evaluate, and prepare for possible futures. Yet these models rest on largely unexamined assumptions about human capacities, behaviour, and access to digital infrastructures. Among the most consequential omissions is disability. Despite the global prevalence of sensory, physical, cognitive, psychosocial, and communication-related disabilities, human diversity remains largely under-represented in adaptation-orientated climate modelling contexts. These models often operationalise populations as cognitively uniform, digitally fluent, and functionally homogeneous. As climate governance increasingly relies on digital systems, such assumptions generate an epistemic narrowing, constraining which futures are rendered thinkable and whose vulnerabilities become visible to policy. Drawing on science and technology studies (STS), digital accessibility research, and epidemiological evidence, this Short Communication examines how climate modelling practices reproduce exclusion through ability-normative imaginaries and inaccessible digital infrastructures. Using conceptual illustrations, it shows how disability is progressively erased from modelling assumptions over time. The paper argues that inclusive climate futures require expanding the ethical and epistemic foundations of modelling itself. A future imagined without disabled people cannot prepare to protect them. • Climate models embed implicit assumptions about human capacity and participation • Disability remains largely absent within climate-modelling imaginaries • Digitalisation may intensify epistemic exclusion in future-making processes • Modelling assumptions influence which vulnerabilities become visible in projected futures • Inclusive climate futures require rethinking the epistemic foundations of modelling

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2026.103833
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the future cannot reach everyone: Disability erasure in climate modelling

Madlena Nen, Edita-Carmen BOKOR
Futures
Disability Rights and Representation
article

When the future cannot reach everyone: Disability erasure in climate modelling

Madlena Nen, Edita-Carmen BOKOR
article en

Abstract

Climate models play a central role in shaping how societies imagine, evaluate, and prepare for possible futures. Yet these models rest on largely unexamined assumptions about human capacities, behaviour, and access to digital infrastructures. Among the most consequential omissions is disability. Despite the global prevalence of sensory, physical, cognitive, psychosocial, and communication-related disabilities, human diversity remains largely under-represented in adaptation-orientated climate modelling contexts. These models often operationalise populations as cognitively uniform, digitally fluent, and functionally homogeneous. As climate governance increasingly relies on digital systems, such assumptions generate an epistemic narrowing, constraining which futures are rendered thinkable and whose vulnerabilities become visible to policy. Drawing on science and technology studies (STS), digital accessibility research, and epidemiological evidence, this Short Communication examines how climate modelling practices reproduce exclusion through ability-normative imaginaries and inaccessible digital infrastructures. Using conceptual illustrations, it shows how disability is progressively erased from modelling assumptions over time. The paper argues that inclusive climate futures require expanding the ethical and epistemic foundations of modelling itself. A future imagined without disabled people cannot prepare to protect them. • Climate models embed implicit assumptions about human capacity and participation • Disability remains largely absent within climate-modelling imaginaries • Digitalisation may intensify epistemic exclusion in future-making processes • Modelling assumptions influence which vulnerabilities become visible in projected futures • Inclusive climate futures require rethinking the epistemic foundations of modelling

FuturesVol. 180
Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.