Automated identification of cancer-associated thrombosis events <i>via</i> natural language processing: a systematic review of the literature

Accurate identification of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in electronic health records is essential for disease surveillance, trial design, and the development of risk stratification models. Manual chart review is impractical at scale, while ICD-code or similar coding system-based extraction often misses events, fails to distinguish incident from prevalent events, or equates bland and tumor thrombi. Natural language processing (NLP) is a promising solution, offering scalable extraction of structured CAT events directly from clinical text. We systematically reviewed the literature for NLP-based pipelines for CAT identification according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for English language studies from 2010-2025. NLP methodology, training strategy, and model performance were extracted from relevant studies. Seven studies, implementing NLP approaches ranging from lexicon or rules-based pipelines to transformer models, met inclusion criteria. Most studies developed and evaluated models using text from a single institution, and only one distinguished incident CAT events from prevalent events. Reported metrics varied between studies, though models tended to exhibit higher specificity and negative predictive value than sensitivity and positive predictive value. Overall, current NLP systems for CAT identification have achieved desired results to assist but not supplant manual chart review. Major limitations include small and institution-specific datasets, absence of external validation, and lack of distinction between incident vs prevalent events. Development of generalizable models will require large, multi-institutional datasets as the field moves towards transformer-based models, and standardized evaluation metrics with shared benchmark test sets are needed for an unbiased measure of progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/btvb.2026.437
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated identification of cancer-associated thrombosis events via natural language processing: a systematic review of the literature

Aidan Boyne, Ang Li, Emily Zhou
Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Topic Modeling
article

Automated identification of cancer-associated thrombosis events via natural language processing: a systematic review of the literature

Aidan Boyne, Ang Li, Emily Zhou
article en

Abstract

Accurate identification of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in electronic health records is essential for disease surveillance, trial design, and the development of risk stratification models. Manual chart review is impractical at scale, while ICD-code or similar coding system-based extraction often misses events, fails to distinguish incident from prevalent events, or equates bland and tumor thrombi. Natural language processing (NLP) is a promising solution, offering scalable extraction of structured CAT events directly from clinical text. We systematically reviewed the literature for NLP-based pipelines for CAT identification according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for English language studies from 2010-2025. NLP methodology, training strategy, and model performance were extracted from relevant studies. Seven studies, implementing NLP approaches ranging from lexicon or rules-based pipelines to transformer models, met inclusion criteria. Most studies developed and evaluated models using text from a single institution, and only one distinguished incident CAT events from prevalent events. Reported metrics varied between studies, though models tended to exhibit higher specificity and negative predictive value than sensitivity and positive predictive value. Overall, current NLP systems for CAT identification have achieved desired results to assist but not supplant manual chart review. Major limitations include small and institution-specific datasets, absence of external validation, and lack of distinction between incident vs prevalent events. Development of generalizable models will require large, multi-institutional datasets as the field moves towards transformer-based models, and standardized evaluation metrics with shared benchmark test sets are needed for an unbiased measure of progress.

Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyVol. 5(s1)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.