Sensitivity and Specificity of Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM) assessment in detecting localised oedema in an ex vivo porcine model

BACKGROUND: Current studies examining the sensitivity and specificity of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) assessment for pressure injury (PI) detection have relied on visible skin changes and clinical judgement as a standard comparator. This approach underestimates the diagnostic accuracy of SEM assessments in detecting localised oedema, which precedes and predicts later stages of pressure-induced tissue death. To address this limitation, a porcine skin model was developed to validate the performance of SEM assessments in detecting developing pressure-induced injuries. METHODOLOGY: Localised oedema was induced into the hind limbs of an ex vivo porcine model via controlled intradermal injections. Two SEM readings were taken from the injection site and two from a control site positioned away from the injection area, resulting in four raw SEM readings. The SEM delta (Δ) value was then calculated in increments of 1 mL of saline injected (10x each). True/false positive and true/false negative rates were evaluated and analysed by correlating the presence of induced localised oedema with SEM Δ values ≥ 0.6. Results are reported as sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 200 SEM Δ values were collected. Data analysis yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 96% in detecting localised oedema in the soft tissue of a porcine model. CONCLUSION: The porcine model used in this study simulates localised oedema volume representative of the earliest stages of PI development in humans. SEM assessment technology was able to detect these changes with high accuracy, demonstrating >90% sensitivity and specificity. Thus, SEM assessment represents a promising validated tool for detecting localised oedema, an indicator of developing tissue damage which is consequential for daily PI prevention and care practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tissue Viability
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2026.101002
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM) assessment in detecting localised oedema in an ex vivo porcine model

Hannah Jane Elizabeth Wilson, G Brunetti, Declan Patton, Fergal O’Brien et al.
Journal of Tissue Viability
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM) assessment in detecting localised oedema in an ex vivo porcine model

Hannah Jane Elizabeth Wilson, G Brunetti, Declan Patton, Fergal O’Brien, Zena Elizabeth Helen Moore
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current studies examining the sensitivity and specificity of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) assessment for pressure injury (PI) detection have relied on visible skin changes and clinical judgement as a standard comparator. This approach underestimates the diagnostic accuracy of SEM assessments in detecting localised oedema, which precedes and predicts later stages of pressure-induced tissue death. To address this limitation, a porcine skin model was developed to validate the performance of SEM assessments in detecting developing pressure-induced injuries. METHODOLOGY: Localised oedema was induced into the hind limbs of an ex vivo porcine model via controlled intradermal injections. Two SEM readings were taken from the injection site and two from a control site positioned away from the injection area, resulting in four raw SEM readings. The SEM delta (Δ) value was then calculated in increments of 1 mL of saline injected (10x each). True/false positive and true/false negative rates were evaluated and analysed by correlating the presence of induced localised oedema with SEM Δ values ≥ 0.6. Results are reported as sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 200 SEM Δ values were collected. Data analysis yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 96% in detecting localised oedema in the soft tissue of a porcine model. CONCLUSION: The porcine model used in this study simulates localised oedema volume representative of the earliest stages of PI development in humans. SEM assessment technology was able to detect these changes with high accuracy, demonstrating >90% sensitivity and specificity. Thus, SEM assessment represents a promising validated tool for detecting localised oedema, an indicator of developing tissue damage which is consequential for daily PI prevention and care practices.

Journal of Tissue ViabilityVol. 35(3)
University College Dublin (IE), Griffith University (AU), European Institute of Women's Health (IE), Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (IE)
Good health and well-being, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.