Deaf people’s experience of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services: a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews

Healthcare services are being transformed with the rapid adoption of digital technology, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, concerns have been expressed around digital exclusion of potentially vulnerable groups such as those experiencing mental health conditions and/or sensory impairment. This study sought to explore deaf people’s experiences of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services and identify opportunities for future service improvement. A qualitative study using a social constructionist approach was conducted with data collected using semi-structured interviews. Deaf participants were recruited using purposeful sampling and drawing on existing professional and community networks. Recruitment information was available in British Sign Language (BSL) and plain English formats. Interviews were video recorded, then data transcribed from sign/spoken language to text, with non-verbal and contextual data from signing and social interactions also captured using notations. Video and textual data were analysed in parallel using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the social model of disability and a published framework for evaluating the success of health technologies. Overarching themes across participants’ accounts were identified. Eleven deaf people participated in the interviews. Ten participants were BSL users; one participant was non-signing and communicated in speech during the interview. Four themes were identified: (1) lack of consideration for deaf individuals’ communication preferences in digital healthcare; (2) social connections facilitate meaningful digital health inclusion; (3) problems with digital systems - flexibility, interoperability and psychological safety; and (4) models of care should optimise deaf people’s independence and accessibility. A study limitation is that data collection and analysis were completed by one researcher. The findings suggest digital health technology can risk exacerbating health inequalities faced by deaf people. Opportunities for early engagement and involvement of deaf people in designing developing, implementing and evaluating digital health technologies is crucial to ensuring acceptability and services tailored to the cultural, communication, language and literacy needs of deaf communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14371-y
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deaf people’s experience of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services: a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews

Sarah Wigham, Amy O’Donnell, Emmanuel Chan
BMC Health Services Research
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Deaf people’s experience of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services: a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews

Sarah Wigham, Amy O’Donnell, Emmanuel Chan
article en

Abstract

Healthcare services are being transformed with the rapid adoption of digital technology, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, concerns have been expressed around digital exclusion of potentially vulnerable groups such as those experiencing mental health conditions and/or sensory impairment. This study sought to explore deaf people’s experiences of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services and identify opportunities for future service improvement. A qualitative study using a social constructionist approach was conducted with data collected using semi-structured interviews. Deaf participants were recruited using purposeful sampling and drawing on existing professional and community networks. Recruitment information was available in British Sign Language (BSL) and plain English formats. Interviews were video recorded, then data transcribed from sign/spoken language to text, with non-verbal and contextual data from signing and social interactions also captured using notations. Video and textual data were analysed in parallel using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the social model of disability and a published framework for evaluating the success of health technologies. Overarching themes across participants’ accounts were identified. Eleven deaf people participated in the interviews. Ten participants were BSL users; one participant was non-signing and communicated in speech during the interview. Four themes were identified: (1) lack of consideration for deaf individuals’ communication preferences in digital healthcare; (2) social connections facilitate meaningful digital health inclusion; (3) problems with digital systems - flexibility, interoperability and psychological safety; and (4) models of care should optimise deaf people’s independence and accessibility. A study limitation is that data collection and analysis were completed by one researcher. The findings suggest digital health technology can risk exacerbating health inequalities faced by deaf people. Opportunities for early engagement and involvement of deaf people in designing developing, implementing and evaluating digital health technologies is crucial to ensuring acceptability and services tailored to the cultural, communication, language and literacy needs of deaf communities.

BMC Health Services Research
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.