Coercive Measures in Patients Hospitalized in Psychiatric Wards: A Contextual Concept Analysis Using a Hybrid Model

INTRODUCTION: The use of coercive measures in psychiatric settings remains a contentious issue at the intersection of clinical necessity and ethical controversy. This study aimed to analyse the concept of coercive measures in inpatient psychiatric care. METHODS: A hybrid concept analysis was conducted. Initially, a comprehensive literature review was performed, encompassing 264 relevant studies. Subsequently, a qualitative phase was conducted in an Iranian psychiatric context, utilizing content analysis to examine 27 semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and psychiatric staff. Methodological rigor was ensured through data triangulation, including 67 field notes from direct observations of coercive events in clinical practice. RESULTS: Coercive measures were defined as "explicit or implicit interventions restricting patients' freedom of choice, movement, and self-determination, primarily to control behavioural disturbances and prevent harm." Their use raises ethical dilemmas regarding autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and dignity, further complicated by a lack of clear guidelines. Findings highlighted the potential for significant physical and psychological harm to patients and staff, sometimes with long-term effects. Perspectives diverged: while staff often emphasized necessity, patients highlighted negative consequences; however, both agreed that many incidents might be preventable through early recognition and management of antecedents. CONCLUSION: This conceptual analysis clarifies coercive measures in psychiatry as multifaceted interventions with ethical, clinical, and psychological implications. By systematically defining the concept and identifying its antecedents, the study provides a foundation for developing guidelines that balance patient autonomy and clinical safety. Reducing coercive practices requires addressing underlying triggers while upholding human rights in psychiatric care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2026.2632768
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coercive Measures in Patients Hospitalized in Psychiatric Wards: A Contextual Concept Analysis Using a Hybrid Model

Hamid Asayesh, Ali Khaji, Vahideh Nayeri, Ahmad Mashkoori et al.
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Coercive Measures in Patients Hospitalized in Psychiatric Wards: A Contextual Concept Analysis Using a Hybrid Model

Hamid Asayesh, Ali Khaji, Vahideh Nayeri, Ahmad Mashkoori, Mohammad Parvaresh-Masoud
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of coercive measures in psychiatric settings remains a contentious issue at the intersection of clinical necessity and ethical controversy. This study aimed to analyse the concept of coercive measures in inpatient psychiatric care. METHODS: A hybrid concept analysis was conducted. Initially, a comprehensive literature review was performed, encompassing 264 relevant studies. Subsequently, a qualitative phase was conducted in an Iranian psychiatric context, utilizing content analysis to examine 27 semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and psychiatric staff. Methodological rigor was ensured through data triangulation, including 67 field notes from direct observations of coercive events in clinical practice. RESULTS: Coercive measures were defined as "explicit or implicit interventions restricting patients' freedom of choice, movement, and self-determination, primarily to control behavioural disturbances and prevent harm." Their use raises ethical dilemmas regarding autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and dignity, further complicated by a lack of clear guidelines. Findings highlighted the potential for significant physical and psychological harm to patients and staff, sometimes with long-term effects. Perspectives diverged: while staff often emphasized necessity, patients highlighted negative consequences; however, both agreed that many incidents might be preventable through early recognition and management of antecedents. CONCLUSION: This conceptual analysis clarifies coercive measures in psychiatry as multifaceted interventions with ethical, clinical, and psychological implications. By systematically defining the concept and identifying its antecedents, the study provides a foundation for developing guidelines that balance patient autonomy and clinical safety. Reducing coercive practices requires addressing underlying triggers while upholding human rights in psychiatric care.

Issues in Mental Health Nursing
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR), Qom University of Medical Science and Health Services (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.