Reimagining human-centric drug development with new approach methodologies

Despite unprecedented technological progress, most drug candidates continue to fail in clinical trials, reflecting a persistent gap between preclinical models and human biology. New approach methodologies (NAMs), by spanning human-derived cellular systems, microphysiological platforms, and artificial intelligence, offer a paradigm shift in human-centric drug development and biomedical research. Recent regulatory reforms, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act 3.0, have begun to position NAMs as a complement to or replacement for animal testing. This Review synthesizes emerging biological and computational NAMs and examines how their integration is reshaping drug development. We also discuss regulatory and ethical frameworks enabling this transition and outline a roadmap for embedding human-based science in a predictive, efficient, and ethically grounded infrastructure of human-centered drug development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeb0045
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining human-centric drug development with new approach methodologies

James Zou, Matthew A. Wu, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Xuekun Wu et al.
Science
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Reimagining human-centric drug development with new approach methodologies

James Zou, Matthew A. Wu, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Xuekun Wu, J Wu
article en

Abstract

Despite unprecedented technological progress, most drug candidates continue to fail in clinical trials, reflecting a persistent gap between preclinical models and human biology. New approach methodologies (NAMs), by spanning human-derived cellular systems, microphysiological platforms, and artificial intelligence, offer a paradigm shift in human-centric drug development and biomedical research. Recent regulatory reforms, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act 3.0, have begun to position NAMs as a complement to or replacement for animal testing. This Review synthesizes emerging biological and computational NAMs and examines how their integration is reshaping drug development. We also discuss regulatory and ethical frameworks enabling this transition and outline a roadmap for embedding human-based science in a predictive, efficient, and ethically grounded infrastructure of human-centered drug development.

ScienceVol. 392(6796)
National Institutes of Health (US), Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), Division of Program Coordination Planning and Strategic Initiatives (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.