Systematic effects of patient factors and scanner/protocol factors on a Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) quantitative MRI biomarker for prostate cancer

While multiparametric MRI has revolutionized clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection, conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps suffer from a monoexponential model that conflate the various forms of diffusion in the tissue, leading to poor microstructural specificity and substantial inter-scanner variability. Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) addresses these limitations with a multi-compartment biophysical model that separates the diffusion signal into four compartments, providing a more specific quantitative imaging biomarker, the Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs). Although RSIrs has demonstrated promising detection performance for csPCa, patient- and acquisition-related factors may influence its measured values and performance. Our retrospective analysis included 1,890 men (median age 70) from seven centers between 2018 and 2024. Our primary objective was to characterize the quantitative technical robustness of RSIrs using linear modeling. We assessed how age, race, ethnicity, prostate volume, medication use, and MRI acquisition parameters influenced prostate maximum RSIrs (RSIrsmax) values. Secondary, we conducted a functional validation of RSIrs’ csPCa detection performance when accounting for any significant effects (if any). Non-csPCa patients in this analysis were (1) with confirmed benign or Grade Group 1 findings on biopsy or (2) with a non-suspicious mpMRI (PI-RADS 1 or 2) and a prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) ≤ 0.15. Results revealed modest effects from age (1.8/year increase), prostate volume (-0.83/mL decrease), and acquisition methods (varying between − 63.14 to + 56.23). While these acquisition- and patient-level variations partially overlapped with change in RSIrsmax due to Grade Group 2 csPCa, these variations were secondary to the primary signal variation due to csPCa. Adjusting for them did not improve csPCa detection performance (p > 0.05). AUC of RSIrsmax for patient-level csPCa detection was 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75–0.79] compared to 0.74 [0.72–0.76] after. RSIrs demonstrates robust csPCa detection performance regardless of modest signal variations from patient and acquisition factors, supporting its potential as a generalizable quantitative imaging biomarker for csPCa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01032-w
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic effects of patient factors and scanner/protocol factors on a Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) quantitative MRI biomarker for prostate cancer

Courtney Ollison, Michael E. Hahn, Dimitri A. Kessler, Joshua Kuperman et al.
Cancer Imaging
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Systematic effects of patient factors and scanner/protocol factors on a Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) quantitative MRI biomarker for prostate cancer

Courtney Ollison, Michael E. Hahn, Dimitri A. Kessler, Joshua Kuperman, Natasha Wehrli, Christopher J. Kane, Tristan Barrett, Sean Woolen, Isabella R. Pompa, Michael A. Liss, P. Murphy, Mariluz Rojo Domingo, Shaun Trecarten, Allison Y. Zhong, Ian Matthews, Karoline Kallis, Michael A. Ohliger, Clare M. Tempany, Eric Weinberg, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Ahmed Shabaik, Nabih Nakrour, Jacob Roberts, Karan Santhosh, Daniel J. A. Margolis, Gary Hollenberg, Felix Feng, George Xu, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Matthew Cooperberg, Kang-Lung Lee, Aditya Bagrodia, Yuze Song, Sophia C. Kamran, Thomas Osinski, Jonathan Levine, Anders M. Dale, Tyler M. Seibert, Juan Javier-Desloges, Christopher C. Conlin, Mukesh Harisinghani, David Song, Madison T. Baxter, Deondre D. Do
article en

Abstract

While multiparametric MRI has revolutionized clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection, conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps suffer from a monoexponential model that conflate the various forms of diffusion in the tissue, leading to poor microstructural specificity and substantial inter-scanner variability. Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) addresses these limitations with a multi-compartment biophysical model that separates the diffusion signal into four compartments, providing a more specific quantitative imaging biomarker, the Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs). Although RSIrs has demonstrated promising detection performance for csPCa, patient- and acquisition-related factors may influence its measured values and performance. Our retrospective analysis included 1,890 men (median age 70) from seven centers between 2018 and 2024. Our primary objective was to characterize the quantitative technical robustness of RSIrs using linear modeling. We assessed how age, race, ethnicity, prostate volume, medication use, and MRI acquisition parameters influenced prostate maximum RSIrs (RSIrsmax) values. Secondary, we conducted a functional validation of RSIrs’ csPCa detection performance when accounting for any significant effects (if any). Non-csPCa patients in this analysis were (1) with confirmed benign or Grade Group 1 findings on biopsy or (2) with a non-suspicious mpMRI (PI-RADS 1 or 2) and a prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) ≤ 0.15. Results revealed modest effects from age (1.8/year increase), prostate volume (-0.83/mL decrease), and acquisition methods (varying between − 63.14 to + 56.23). While these acquisition- and patient-level variations partially overlapped with change in RSIrsmax due to Grade Group 2 csPCa, these variations were secondary to the primary signal variation due to csPCa. Adjusting for them did not improve csPCa detection performance (p > 0.05). AUC of RSIrsmax for patient-level csPCa detection was 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75–0.79] compared to 0.74 [0.72–0.76] after. RSIrs demonstrates robust csPCa detection performance regardless of modest signal variations from patient and acquisition factors, supporting its potential as a generalizable quantitative imaging biomarker for csPCa.

Cancer Imaging
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Cornell University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), UC San Diego Health System (US), University of California System (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), La Jolla Bioengineering Institute (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Foundation, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.