On Traces and Addends: : Reflections on Bensusan’s Memory Assemblages

This paper opens a dialogue between the philosophical account of memory developed by Bensusan in Memory Assemblages and contemporary debates in the analytic philosophy of memory. I take the notion of the trace as a point of departure to examine the way Bensusan shifts from the traditional view of memory as a psychological faculty toward a broader ontological perspective—pan-mnemism—according to which memory constitutes a fundamental dimension of reality. Embracing this move, Bensusan offers an account of the conditions of possibility that underlie memory as a psychological term. I then analyse the conception of memory that derives from this framework, where traces do not preserve stable contents from the past but instead function as open structures that acquire meaning only through “addends.” I contrast this view with classical causal theories of memory and argue that Bensusan’s proposal can be understood as a radicalization of constructivist and post-causal theories, one that emphasizes the situated character of memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cosmos and history
Published
2026-04-15
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Traces and Addends: : Reflections on Bensusan’s Memory Assemblages

Elena Ostos
Cosmos and history
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

On Traces and Addends: : Reflections on Bensusan’s Memory Assemblages

Elena Ostos
article en

Abstract

This paper opens a dialogue between the philosophical account of memory developed by Bensusan in Memory Assemblages and contemporary debates in the analytic philosophy of memory. I take the notion of the trace as a point of departure to examine the way Bensusan shifts from the traditional view of memory as a psychological faculty toward a broader ontological perspective—pan-mnemism—according to which memory constitutes a fundamental dimension of reality. Embracing this move, Bensusan offers an account of the conditions of possibility that underlie memory as a psychological term. I then analyse the conception of memory that derives from this framework, where traces do not preserve stable contents from the past but instead function as open structures that acquire meaning only through “addends.” I contrast this view with classical causal theories of memory and argue that Bensusan’s proposal can be understood as a radicalization of constructivist and post-causal theories, one that emphasizes the situated character of memory.

Cosmos and history
Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Traces and Addends: : Reflections on Bensusan’s Memory Assemblages — Elena Ostos · Cosmos and history (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS