High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making, yet recent reforms to the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) risk creating a category of high-risk medical AI systems without corresponding safeguards. In the current framework, AI-enabled medical devices are regulated through a combination of sectoral medical device legislation, the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR), and additional AI-specific safeguards in the AI Act. Recent EU “simplification” initiatives, including the Digital Omnibus and the Health Innovation Package, propose to remove these safeguards. This narrative review analyses recent EU legislative developments and their impact on the relationship between the AI Act and medical device law. It shows that the proposed reforms would retain the high-risk classification of AI-enabled medical devices while removing most associated AI Act obligations. In effect, this decouples risk classification from the safeguards that give it regulatory meaning, including requirements on data governance, risk management, human oversight, and post-market monitoring. Rather than resolving regulatory overlap, the reforms shift the centre of gravity back to product-focused medical device law without ensuring equivalent AI-specific safeguards. These changes may narrow attention to fundamental rights, weaken oversight in clinical use, and increase legal uncertainty regarding accountability and responsibility. In a domain where AI systems directly shape clinical decisions and patient outcomes, these changes risk undermining the conditions for safe, equitable, and accountable deployment of medical AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19591706
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI

Hannah van Kolfschooten, Barry Solaiman, Daria Onitiu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI

Hannah van Kolfschooten, Barry Solaiman, Daria Onitiu
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making, yet recent reforms to the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) risk creating a category of high-risk medical AI systems without corresponding safeguards. In the current framework, AI-enabled medical devices are regulated through a combination of sectoral medical device legislation, the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR), and additional AI-specific safeguards in the AI Act. Recent EU “simplification” initiatives, including the Digital Omnibus and the Health Innovation Package, propose to remove these safeguards. This narrative review analyses recent EU legislative developments and their impact on the relationship between the AI Act and medical device law. It shows that the proposed reforms would retain the high-risk classification of AI-enabled medical devices while removing most associated AI Act obligations. In effect, this decouples risk classification from the safeguards that give it regulatory meaning, including requirements on data governance, risk management, human oversight, and post-market monitoring. Rather than resolving regulatory overlap, the reforms shift the centre of gravity back to product-focused medical device law without ensuring equivalent AI-specific safeguards. These changes may narrow attention to fundamental rights, weaken oversight in clinical use, and increase legal uncertainty regarding accountability and responsibility. In a domain where AI systems directly shape clinical decisions and patient outcomes, these changes risk undermining the conditions for safe, equitable, and accountable deployment of medical AI.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Harvard University (US), Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Basel (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI — Hannah van Kolfschooten, Barry Solaiman, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS