Body anthropometry affects spatiotemporal preferences in walking and running

Despite general similarity of walking and running gaits in healthy humans, spatiotemporal parameters vary considerably between individuals. While this variation is well recognized, the underlying causes are poorly understood. In this study we examined whether differences in body mass, relative segment lengths (e.g., relative leg length and relative foot length) and relative segment masses (e.g., relative foot-shoe mass) contribute to the spatiotemporal variability, beyond what is accounted for by Froude number. We collected anthropometric and spatiotemporal data from 103 trained runners (65 males, 38 females) walking (1.25 m/s and 2 m/s) and running (2-4.17 m/s) on a force-measuring treadmill. Linear mixed-effects models assessed the contribution of anthropometric factors to inter-individual differences in gait. Froude number alone accounted for most of the variation in spatiotemporal variables (R²=0.71-0.92 in walking; 0.01-0.94 in running). Including anthropometric predictors improved model performance, particularly for variables with lower Froude dependence, increasing R² to 0.77-0.93 (walking) and 0.16-0.94 (running). Specifically, heavier individuals and those with larger relative foot lengths exhibited longer stance times and higher duty factors (p≤0.033), without differences in stride frequency (p≥0.164). In walking, these longer stance times were primarily driven by prolonged double support time (p<0.001). Additionally, greater relative foot-shoe mass reduced stride frequency via longer leg swing times in both gaits (p≤0.007). We suggest that this spatiotemporal variability reflects individual strategies to minimize metabolic cost of locomotion by adjusting the trade-off between stance-phase and swing-phase metabolic demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.252161
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body anthropometry affects spatiotemporal preferences in walking and running

Wannes Swinnen, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Friedl De Groote, Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal of Experimental Biology
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Body anthropometry affects spatiotemporal preferences in walking and running

Wannes Swinnen, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Friedl De Groote, Wouter Hoogkamer
article en

Abstract

Despite general similarity of walking and running gaits in healthy humans, spatiotemporal parameters vary considerably between individuals. While this variation is well recognized, the underlying causes are poorly understood. In this study we examined whether differences in body mass, relative segment lengths (e.g., relative leg length and relative foot length) and relative segment masses (e.g., relative foot-shoe mass) contribute to the spatiotemporal variability, beyond what is accounted for by Froude number. We collected anthropometric and spatiotemporal data from 103 trained runners (65 males, 38 females) walking (1.25 m/s and 2 m/s) and running (2-4.17 m/s) on a force-measuring treadmill. Linear mixed-effects models assessed the contribution of anthropometric factors to inter-individual differences in gait. Froude number alone accounted for most of the variation in spatiotemporal variables (R²=0.71-0.92 in walking; 0.01-0.94 in running). Including anthropometric predictors improved model performance, particularly for variables with lower Froude dependence, increasing R² to 0.77-0.93 (walking) and 0.16-0.94 (running). Specifically, heavier individuals and those with larger relative foot lengths exhibited longer stance times and higher duty factors (p≤0.033), without differences in stride frequency (p≥0.164). In walking, these longer stance times were primarily driven by prolonged double support time (p<0.001). Additionally, greater relative foot-shoe mass reduced stride frequency via longer leg swing times in both gaits (p≤0.007). We suggest that this spatiotemporal variability reflects individual strategies to minimize metabolic cost of locomotion by adjusting the trade-off between stance-phase and swing-phase metabolic demands.

Journal of Experimental Biology
Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Ghent University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven, Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.