Self-reported anal cancer screening experiences in MSM: recency, follow-up, and methodological insights

Introduction: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anal cancer. Prior to national anal cancer screening guidelines, literature suggested that the overall utilization of screening was low, with slightly higher uptake in MSM living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The objective of this study was to report the recency of anal cancer screening by various screening methods and describe differences in self-reported screening histories by HIV status in MSM. We also aimed to comment on the use of cross-sectional methods for research on anal cancer screening utilization in MSM. Methods: This cross-sectional survey recruited MSM in Minnesota from two online dating sites to participate in a single survey on anal cancer screening experiences. Fisher's exact tests and t-tests were used to examine differences in demographics and screening experiences by HIV status. Results: . 29.2%, p = 0.018). Discussion: Our findings suggest that MSM in Minnesota are utilizing anal cancer screenings in accordance with current recommendations. MSM living with HIV were more likely to report a history of HPV-related infections and abnormal results, supporting continued prioritization of screening in this population. The differences in recommending providers by HIV status highlight the need for additional training to support equitable and consistent practices. Finally, we suggest the use of alternative methods to document future anal cancer screening utilization in MSM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1689760
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-reported anal cancer screening experiences in MSM: recency, follow-up, and methodological insights

Jason V. Baker, Sarah L. Bennis, Xianghua Luo, Shalini Kulasingam et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Self-reported anal cancer screening experiences in MSM: recency, follow-up, and methodological insights

Jason V. Baker, Sarah L. Bennis, Xianghua Luo, Shalini Kulasingam, Eva A. Enns, M. Kumi Smith
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anal cancer. Prior to national anal cancer screening guidelines, literature suggested that the overall utilization of screening was low, with slightly higher uptake in MSM living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The objective of this study was to report the recency of anal cancer screening by various screening methods and describe differences in self-reported screening histories by HIV status in MSM. We also aimed to comment on the use of cross-sectional methods for research on anal cancer screening utilization in MSM. Methods: This cross-sectional survey recruited MSM in Minnesota from two online dating sites to participate in a single survey on anal cancer screening experiences. Fisher's exact tests and t-tests were used to examine differences in demographics and screening experiences by HIV status. Results: . 29.2%, p = 0.018). Discussion: Our findings suggest that MSM in Minnesota are utilizing anal cancer screenings in accordance with current recommendations. MSM living with HIV were more likely to report a history of HPV-related infections and abnormal results, supporting continued prioritization of screening in this population. The differences in recommending providers by HIV status highlight the need for additional training to support equitable and consistent practices. Finally, we suggest the use of alternative methods to document future anal cancer screening utilization in MSM.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
University of Minnesota (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), Hospital for Tropical Diseases (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.