A medical consultation simulation in a preclinical biochemistry seminar: Does training in a high-fidelity simulation practice provide an advantage over a simulation in a traditional seminar room?

Objective: : The ability to talk to patients is an important medical competence. Therefore, new teaching methods need to be developed and their usefulness and effectiveness studied. The objective of the study was to determine whether there are differences in the acquisition of communication skills or student evaluation depending on whether the simulated conversation is carried out in a high-fidelity simulation practice ("To Train U", TTU) or in a traditional seminar room (SR). Methods: =131). Both groups completed a communication competency test before and after the simulation, which was used to test Bloom's level II-IV. An online evaluation was completed after the simulation. Results: Both groups showed significant increases in their overall communication competence scores. The TTU group improved significantly with regard to Bloom levels II and IV, the SR group only with regard to Level II. The TTU group reported higher satisfaction levels and perceived the simulation to be more realistic and conducive to learning than the SR group. Conclusion: High-fidelity simulation practices provide an innovative learning environment that enhances the student skills, motivation and satisfaction. Future studies should examine whether training in such settings may have lasting effects on the medical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001845
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A medical consultation simulation in a preclinical biochemistry seminar: Does training in a high-fidelity simulation practice provide an advantage over a simulation in a traditional seminar room?

Susanne J. Kühl, A. Schneider, Tobias M. Böckers, Leonard K. Saitta et al.
PubMed
Innovations in Medical Education
article

A medical consultation simulation in a preclinical biochemistry seminar: Does training in a high-fidelity simulation practice provide an advantage over a simulation in a traditional seminar room?

Susanne J. Kühl, A. Schneider, Tobias M. Böckers, Leonard K. Saitta, Melissa Meral
article en

Abstract

Objective: : The ability to talk to patients is an important medical competence. Therefore, new teaching methods need to be developed and their usefulness and effectiveness studied. The objective of the study was to determine whether there are differences in the acquisition of communication skills or student evaluation depending on whether the simulated conversation is carried out in a high-fidelity simulation practice ("To Train U", TTU) or in a traditional seminar room (SR). Methods: =131). Both groups completed a communication competency test before and after the simulation, which was used to test Bloom's level II-IV. An online evaluation was completed after the simulation. Results: Both groups showed significant increases in their overall communication competence scores. The TTU group improved significantly with regard to Bloom levels II and IV, the SR group only with regard to Level II. The TTU group reported higher satisfaction levels and perceived the simulation to be more realistic and conducive to learning than the SR group. Conclusion: High-fidelity simulation practices provide an innovative learning environment that enhances the student skills, motivation and satisfaction. Future studies should examine whether training in such settings may have lasting effects on the medical practice.

PubMedVol. 43(4)
Universität Ulm (DE), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.